The guilty or not posts don’t bother me unless they’re on the threads about pedophilia.. It’s gross and vulgar to make light of the fact that these women used underage boys sexually, no matter how they appear outwardly. If it’s just done in jest, why isn’t guilty or not found on the threads where the genders are reversed? Wouldn’t it be also hilarious to make comments about whether a man, based on his appearance, is guilty or not of having sex with an underage girl?
I personally know a young man who was so devastated by the shame of being raped by his teacher that he later committed suicide. Yeah, I could post a picture of the disgusting pervert that did it, she’s still in jail. Wouldn’t that be fun to determine if she is guilty or not based on her photo?
Just stop. It’s not funny.
I'm calling BS on that. The last time a guy committed suicide because he got laid was , well, never.
Just stop. It’s not funny."
Wholeheartedly agree, sir. Some are loathe to conform to propriety in the name of asserting their 1st A rights...
Sad indeed...
I fully agree.
The only time I have a problem with it is when it concerns adult/minor sex.
I agree with you 100 percent. The thing that really grosses me out is when men make comments like, “I wish she was my teacher when I was a boy,” or “I’d hit it.” It’s disgusting.
“...why isn’t guilty or not found on the threads where the genders are reversed?”
It has to do with the origin of the practice, and the meaning of it, which is not what the “offended” posters around here seem to think it is.