Rep. Scott Peters beats Carl DeMaio for San Diego seat (Homosexual Rino loses afterall)

Politico ^ | 11/7/14 | MJ LEE

[icwhatudo]

California Democratic Rep. Scott Peters has defeated (homosexual)Republican challenger Carl DeMaio in one of the most competitive House races in the country.

The Associated Press called the race Friday night, nearly 72 hours after polls closed in the San Diego-area district. Peters, who trailed DeMaio in early returns, currently leads the Republican by 4,491 votes, 51.2 percent to 48.8 percent.

[icwhatudo]

The "republican" in the race, DeMaio (seen above holding his "partner's" hand), ws accused of sexual misconducted with 2 different male staffers. He was being hailed by the media as a new breed of republican that would move the party forward. He supports abortion and homosexual marriage and was supported by John Boehner despite calls from leading social conservative groups not to.

[hoosierham]

Boehner and McConnell losing would have been a plus for the nation.

[madprof98]

Good.

[Timber Rattler]

No big loss.

[Viennacon]

Let me tell you the annoyance of this.

Boehner poured a lot of MONEY into this race. It should have gone to Bongino, McSally.... or GILLESPIE!

For crying out loud, as well as the war on conservatives, the idiotic allocation of funds has also made this less of a wave than it could have been. Wehby in Oregon should not have gotten a dime. Nor should this guy.

[SoFloFreeper]

[Hostage]

Boehner was likely a conduit for some other person’s money with instructions where to steer it but he could of declined to be of service.

It shows how easily Boehner is bought.

[SoFloFreeper]

I agree. Wehby and this guy shouldn’t have gotten a penny.

Imagine Gillespie gettin’ the money....although I wonder if Gillespie is a true conservative.

Anyhoo....it is over. I wonder if any lessons will be learned.

[massmike]

Attention GOP:

[Charles Henrickson]

He supports abortion and homosexual marriage. . . .

And thus I could not have voted for him, even though he's a Republican. Those are the two issues where I draw the line. I always vote for the Republican, even if I don't agree with him on 100% of the issues, because I know that overall he will be more conservative than the Democrat. But if the Republican supports abortion or sodomite "marriage," then my conscience will not allow me to vote for him. God has spoken quite clearly on those matters.

[SunkenCiv]

California Democratic Rep. Scott Peters has defeated (homosexual) Republican challenger Carl DeMaio

IOW, heavily Democrat southern California is homophobic.

[Kenny Bunk]

You can't Blame Boehner. He was drunk and he was in Walter Reed being treated for Mulatto Gluteal Osculation Syndrome. (The dreaded MGOS) McConnell appears to have contracted it as well.

Instead of giving the queer the money, they should have taken him for a long walk on a short pier.

[stevio]

I didn’t follow this race at all except for some headlines. I do remember Boehner being more combative in his support for this Sodomite. An yea, this is one race I’m glad the GOPe lost.

[Mariner]

It's one thing to be a homo Republican. It MIGHT be possible to get away with that.

But a Gary Rights, in your face homo Republican? No way.

[mulligan]

No loss for the Republicans.

[Graybeard58]

Then you wouldn’t have gotten to vote for gov in Illinois, if you lived there. Both candidates pro death to babies and pro queer.

By the way, I didn’t vote for either candidate but I did vote, plenty of other issues on the ballot.

I heard plenty of, “if you don’t vote for Rauner, then by default, you are voting for Quinn”. I don’t give a big rats a$$.

[Graybeard58]

But a Gary Rights, in your face homo Republican? No way.

What do you have against Gary?

I never make typros myself.

[montag813]

The GOPe gave this fag harrasser hundreds of thousands and Joni Ernst not a single penny. I just wish we could purge these bastards once and for all

[Balding_Eagle]

I heard plenty of, “if you don’t vote for Rauner, then by default, you are voting for Quinn”.

The question to put to those who say that, now that the election is over; "I didn't vote for either, but you say I cast a vote for Quinn? Tell me, if I had actually cast a vote for Quinn, would that mean he got TWO votes from me? One from me for NOT voting for Rauner, PLUS the one when I actually cast one for Quinn?"

[Charles Henrickson]

That would have been a tough decision for me to make in my home state of Illinois, if I still lived there. I just can’t bring myself to vote for anyone who is pro-abortion. That used to be my one and only “deal-breaker” to keep me from voting for a Republican. But now, in the last few years since homosexual “marriage” has become an issue, that is my other deal-breaker.