Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Packed lunches 'have poorer nutritional quality' than school lunches
Medical News Today ^ | November 08, 2014 | Honor Whiteman

Posted on 11/08/2014 3:05:27 AM PST by Bettyprob

Many parents prefer to send their children off to school with a packed lunch, believing that the food they have given them is far healthier than school lunches. But a new study, published in the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, claims this may not be the case.

The research team, led by Alisha R. Farris of the Department of Human Nutrition, Food and Exercise at Virginia Tech, found that school lunches had better average nutritional quality than packed lunches.

"We found that both packed and school lunches almost entirely met nutrition standards, except school lunches were below energy and iron recommendations, whereas packed lunches exceeded fat and saturated fat recommendations," says Farris.

The quality of school lunches has been a major focus in recent years. In 2012, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) updated the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) guidelines, setting out a number of recommendations with the aim of offering healthier food choices to children at school.

As part of the guidelines, the USDA recommend that schools should ensure students are offered fruits and vegetables every day, are offered fat-free or low-fat milk varieties, given a choice of whole-grain rich foods and are served the correct food portion size, based on their age.

It seems these recommendations have proved successful so far. In March, Medical News Today reported on a study from Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, MA, claiming that the guidelines have increased consumption of fruits and vegetables among low-income students.

(Excerpt) Read more at medicalnewstoday.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: fascism; food; michelleobama; outrightlie; school; schoollunches; usda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last
To: Bettyprob

Study finds government knows best.


81 posted on 11/08/2014 9:31:06 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Yeah, peanuts are a huge threat that requires all our attention. Never mind virus-clogged alien armies crossing the border. Nothing to talk about there.


82 posted on 11/08/2014 9:35:18 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

I find it impossible to believe the lunches at my daughter’s school are healthier than what we pack for her.
Peanut butter & homemade jam on whole wheat bread (yes, peanut butter is still allowed, just not in classrooms though-only cafeteria), carrots and ranch dip, homemade applesauce, and sometimes a handful of Doritos or Cheetos or a homemade cookie.
My 9 year old daughter is 99% for her height, 75% for her weight (tall & thin), has no allergies or health problems. She has 2 ballet classes a week and much rather play outside than be on computer, TV or video games. She’s smart, empathetic, polite and happy.
All that without an ounce of help from the government!


83 posted on 11/08/2014 10:04:46 AM PST by jodster36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob
Packed lunches 'have poorer nutritional quality' than school lunches

Even if I accepted their claims, which I do not, this is not the issue.

The issue is "it is none of their business!"

So get their noses out of packed lunches which are private property. And while at it, get the Wookie's fat butt out of school lunches!

84 posted on 11/08/2014 10:09:59 AM PST by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #85 Removed by Moderator

To: Bettyprob

People don’t pack lunches because they think they are more nutricious.

They do so because they know what their kids like, and they are cheaper. And also because the kids will otherwise eat candy.


86 posted on 11/08/2014 6:54:52 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson