Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CorporateStepsister

How is there even a legal case?

She wrote about these things which happened with her sister. She wrote it in her book. Her book is publicly available. The site is quoting what she wrote in her book. Someone tell me where any sort of legal violation, or legal libel/slander/accusations of any kind are involved.


5 posted on 11/05/2014 1:26:43 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

She’s getting reactive and upset since she probably got a call from HBO with a hysterical television executive on the phone.


8 posted on 11/05/2014 1:27:54 PM PST by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Makes for a great basis for tort reform legislation. Multimillion suit against media to supress factual info. All based on agenda. Chilling effects. Oh yea. Sue baby. SUE!!!


9 posted on 11/05/2014 1:28:41 PM PST by Norm Lenhart ("Refusing to vote against unprincipled people made Obama President. " - agere_contra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Even if she had not written up the case against herself and published it, there would still be a very high burden of proof for her in terms of libel and slander because she is a public figure.

She does not have a hoof to stand on.

17 posted on 11/05/2014 1:34:44 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
She wrote about these things which happened with her sister. She wrote it in her book. Her book is publicly available. The site is quoting what she wrote in her book. Someone tell me where any sort of legal violation, or legal libel/slander/accusations of any kind are involved.

There isn't remotely a legal claim there. If she is foolish enough to file a lawsuit, it will be bounced long before there is any discovery or a trial.

18 posted on 11/05/2014 1:36:00 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego; Sarah Barracuda

Technically, it’s not her own words being quoted - she described being “curious”, and the website is the one actually calling it sexual abuse in their title. So there may be grounds for complaint.

That said, given everything else about Lena Dunham’s past history, there may very well be other sexual skeletons that she doesn’t want to come out, which would in Discovery.

How brave is Truth Revolt? Ready to call a bluff?


26 posted on 11/05/2014 1:41:22 PM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Maybe it's more of a nuisance threat of a suit. If they have to get a lawyer and do a lot of paperwork and go through a lot of aggravation, she "wins" even if she doesn't have a case and doesn't actually go to court.

Plus, it seems like the media lines up where you'd expect them to. Because the big media likes Lena, they'll take her side in a big way, so she wins in the big media's court of public opinion.

Ironically, Lena Dunham's approach to this is what gets attacked as a "rich White guy" argument -- "Because of who I am, I can't be a sexual abuser; it's other people who do that (even when she does it herself), other less privileged people who the derogatory label applies to."

28 posted on 11/05/2014 1:44:46 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Someone tell me where any sort of legal violation ..


             

54 posted on 11/05/2014 4:49:22 PM PST by tomkat (/.02)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson