The judges decision sure sounds like a restriction on her movement, only not confined to house but a wider area.
How does this get reported as a lose for quarantine advocates.
Maybe she's not feeling so well that she took this sooooo gallantly.....besides being "dressed" by her attorney.
Yes, the judge is a Dem...former member of the House in Maine. Nuf said.........
Because it's not a quarantine. Or really even a restriction on her movements. The order is available here. The order only requires Hickox to do three things:
1. Participate in and cooperate with "Direct Active Monitoring," as that term is defined by the United States Centers for Disease Control in its October 29, 2014 [guidance];
2. Coordinate her travel with public health authorities to ensure uninterrupted Direct Active Monitoring; and
3. Immediately notify public health authorities and follow their directions if any symptom appears.
This is a loss for quarantine advocates (and a win for Hickox), because these rules are consistent with (and do not go beyond) the CDC guidance for people in Hickox's risk class, and Hickox had already agreed to abide by the CDC rules.