He was never notified about it. He was in jail when the process server certified that he refused service at his HOUSE. The first he ever knew about it was this year. The real father has been involved in the child's life, apparently, but the state is not interested in pursuing HIM for this, but rather this guy, who the mother fraudulently named. She even admits she lied.
The guy owes nothing but he got a Liberal judge who didn't care about truth. It was about process and who cares if the people involved in the process were liars. . . and even if it were provably so that they were. Too bad. Pay up.
Just one more ton of evidence that proves the diagnosis that my girlfriend and I came up with that we are submitting to the IDC-10 addenda for the next revision, The Judge and prosecutor are suffering from severe cases of:
321.0 SPLAT Liberal Cerebral Defenestration (LCD) or Liberal Acquired Brain Absence (LABA), Complete loss of rationality, cognition, and cerebration due to indiscriminately keeping one's mind so far open that the brain falls out. First and subsequent encounters.
I thought the first he knew about it was during a traffic stop in the ‘90s.
The system does not want the precedent. It can screw up a revenue stream. Plus women voters would really not like that.
If a non-married man can beat having to pay child support if DNA evidence shows he's not the father, then there will be pressure to make DNA matching standard procedure before awarding child support.
And then married men will argue, on "equal protection" grounds, that they should not have to pay child support for children that are the product of a wife's unfaithfulness.
Rule 308 is the only way to remedy this.