Posted on 10/28/2014 6:06:26 PM PDT by Nachum
A large number of non-citizens cast ballots in U.S. elections and it’s possible that the illegal votes were responsible for President Obama’s 2008 victory, according to an in-depth academic study that confirms Judicial Watch’s assessment that foreign nationals have helped Democrats steal elections.
Non-citizens tend to favor Democrats and Obama won more than 80% of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 sample gathered by the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), a large-scale academic survey project operated by teams of researchers from across the country. In fact, enough ineligible voters cast ballots in 2008 to conceivably account for Democratic victories in a few close elections, CCES researchers found. A respected Ivy League professor is coordinator of the CCES which has produced national sample surveys, stratified by state and type of district, in every federal election since 2006. This allows the optimal study of congressional and state races as well as an ideal setting for understanding the relationship between the congressional and presidential elections.
The CCES is an esteemed and highly respected operation that recently published shocking information, gathered from big social science survey datasets, that supports Judicial Watch’s work in this area. In 2012 JW launched the Election Integrity Project, a widespread legal campaign to clean up voter registration rolls and support election integrity measures across the country. Our investigations immediately uncovered data that proved voter rolls in a number of states—including Mississippi, Iowa, Indiana, Missouri, Texas, Florida, California and Colorado—contained the names of individuals who are ineligible to vote.
Now the CCES confirms this, specifically that large numbers of foreign nationals vote in U.S. elections. The “participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections,” according to a mainstream newspaper article written by two of
(Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org ...
Yes, and a bear may possibly defecate in the woods occasionally! If there EVER was a winner of the NSS Award, that headline is it!
I seriously doubt he was elected by the illegals.. It was the crooked electronic voting machines....
It’s not the surviving part, and God knows I want this idiot to live so the truth can unfold about him(last thing we need is another martyr), it’s the shared manner of election, fraud, thuggery, and theft.
Ya' think?
OK. It’s over now. I will say this just this one time.
When I went to bed on election night, I prayed that Romney would win. I specifically heard that no, the other guy would win and would steal the election and know that he did.
I tried to convince myself that this couldn’t be true. I am not particularly tuned into the Man upstairs or his ambassadors. But that’s what I heard.
OK. Flame away.
This is kind of a snap judgement.
Just because certain precincts in some cities had 115% of registered voters vote.
Just because precinct/polling place after precinct/polling place had 0 votes for an R.
Now this year, at least TWO states have proof positive of defective machines and we are supposed to believe they are the only two machines that need ‘calibration’.
I still contend the ONLY way to get a handle on this is NO MONEY to a Pol from ANYONE other than he will DIRECTLY represent. NO EXCEPTIONS.
We are paying for these Pols to fly all over the country to campaign for candidates in other states. THEN have the gall to stand there and say the “R’s” are buying elections with outside money (One of the idiots that went to New England..think it was OMalley) I am not just blaming D’s here they ALL are ‘guilty’.
I dont know if MD is as much a runaway the D’s want you to think...Maybe they (D’s) don’t want another ‘K K Townsend’ situation - MD may ‘still’ have a more Southern Mindset than anyone wants to believe....
I didn’t need Judicial Watch to tell me this. If the election had been honest and the press hadn’t been journalistic jokes, Obama would never have gotten near the White House.
The election was already decided before he entered the race. .
May have been elected with illegal votes????????? I (and all of FR) were certain of that years ago.
yep....
no family members voted for him, but a couple of people I called friends did...ONCE.
buyers remorse can be so instructive.
How many with small margins? Certainly in 2012 just enough. Perhaps your memory is poor. Mine isn’t.
Reminds me of the Geico commercials—everyone knows that...
Yes, a criminal, thief, liar, serial murderer, sociopath.
Just like a bear MAY **it in the woods
After almost 8 years they come up with this revelation we knew right after 2008. The gop allowed this to go on without a peep. They are worse than the criminals we now have in control
My gut and common sense tells me that Hussein was elected both in 2008 and 2012 through criminal voting fraud.
However, since the criminality involved both Eric Holder and the criminal DOJ, as well as the White House, as expected, no investigations were possible.
The progressive Marxist-Fabians campaign for computerized voting, early voting and voting by mail created the perfect storm for efficient fraud.
Twice.
The hopeless scenario, with the "loyal opposition" helpless as newborn babies, only portends more of the same.
Should the Republicans win both the House and the senate this election, their greatest new experience will be to learn how a minority can stymie efficient governance. Unfortunately they will be unable or unwilling to apply the lessons learned.
We are screwed.
Really???
Sí, se puedeWhat was the clue???!!! </sarc>
Until there's a smoking gun or this is in the Congressional Register, moot point and another distraction, IMHO.
After 2012 one of the media “numbers” guys (Barone?) wrote an interesting article about 21st century vote fraud.
He said old style box stuffing was no longer required. Instead, if you had a good IT data mining operation it wasn’t too hard. Given the vast amount of data from the Census Bureau, coupled with voting records and your own internal polling, it wouldn’t be hard to identify and make targets of individual key precincts - precincts,not cities or counties - that would sway the tide in your direction even if it means some small numbers(harder to catch) fraud to get the desired result.
(D) reportedly have very good capabilities now, aided by Google people so it’s quite possible such things happened.
Maybe this partially explains those 100% (D) results in many places and so on.
I’ve tried but failed to find that article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.