Duh, I posted the case law.
If you think you can change your title unilaterally go ahead. I certainly won’t stand in your way. I am always open to smart people like you who re-interpret my meaning and claim special powers.
Duh is right on the money. Case law requires a case or cases. What you posted was a synopsis laced with opinion and what's more you didn't even read it or you would know that the HOA will lose in court because they have no "substntial interest" inbanning a well kept flagpole within a flower bed becasue they say it is a burden to mow around flower beds yet they mow around all sorts of flower beds in the development. Some flower beds are more equal than others morph?