Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL

The person who originally built the properties has that right to make that determination.

membership is determined then and required by title.

Letting properties opt out over time undermines the community established during the original development and is impractical to change in a number of ways.

Don’t buy there.


37 posted on 10/28/2014 12:34:02 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: morphing libertarian

You are ascribing to HOA’s the power of governments


38 posted on 10/28/2014 12:37:57 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian
The person who originally built the properties has that right to make that determination.

LOL. Law school in Zambia?

54 posted on 10/28/2014 1:05:43 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

:-} Back to reality. You said “The person who originally built the properties has that right to make that determination”. I called bs. You cited natural law from 17th century England to back your claim. I laughed out loud and made light of that. The person who originally built the property has no say in whether or not a future homeowner votes yea or nay to an HOA. None, nada, zippo.


75 posted on 10/28/2014 2:54:18 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson