He was not only my gruff guardian angel, but the nation’s as well.
It was a dark and stormy night . . . LMAO
Posted on 10/27/2014 8:22:44 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
Like all charming and physically imposing persons, Ben Bradlee had an enormous head.
There. I said it: the last original observation not already to be found in the three billion words of tribute that poured forth after the death last week of Bradlee, the great editor of the Washington Post and an essential figure in the late-20th-century American establishment. And it’s true, when you met Bradlee and spoke to him, the thing that really overwhelmed you, more than the face-famous good looks and the booming voice inflected with Beacon Hill lockjaw, was the sheer scale of that melon rising up from the stiff white collar of his Savile Row shirt. No one failed to walk away impressed. I still haven’t got over it. Obviously.
So it goes when a famous person dies these days: The tributes were equally about the newly dead and the people paying him homage. There was the goopy exaggeration that always comes with graveyard prose—and always perfectly appropriate, too, under the principle De mortuis nil nisi bonum (“If you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all”) and its modern corollary: “If you say something nice, overdo it.” “Ben Bradlee was someone in a newspaper office that the country needed at a very dark time for democracy,” overwrote one Esquire blogger earnestly. An old Bradlee protégé—there are scores of these, and last week it was all hands on deck—closed his tribute like so: “I for one often imagine Ben as a kind of journalistic King Arthur and we, his Knights of the Round Table. He was not only my gruff guardian angel, but the nation’s as well.”
That’s a lot of metaphor for two little sentences, but grief can do that to a protégé. Here’s another one: “His passing, in a way, marks the end of the 20th century.” About time.
Many of the tributes were of the I’ll-never-forget-the-day-Ben-first-met-me variety, recollections of young reporters cowering before the great man and his massive desk as he bestowed his famous f-bombs upon them like papal blessings. (Bradlee was revered for his profanity.) They were more like pocket memoirs than obituaries, and the upshot seemed to be that Bradlee’s true greatness rested in his hiring of the memoirist and others just like him.
Twitter is particularly useful in getting this kind of daisy chain going. Michele Norris, the former NPR news reader, tweeted a tweet that read (my translation from the twitterese): “Careers shaped by Bradlee: John Harris, Peter Baker, Gwen Ifill, Mike Wilbon, Michel McQueen Martin”—all of whom are famous among themselves for being famous journalists. One of those mentioned, Peter Baker of the New York Times, instantly retweeted Michele’s tweet with this modification: “And Michele Norris!”
Indeed, Bradlee’s death may cement Twitter as the indispensable tool of the self-referential obituarist. You can do so many things with Twitter when someone dies. Consider this multitasking tweet from yet another no-longer-young protégé: “Last time I saw Ben Bradlee [who suffered dementia], he said, ‘I can’t remember who the f— you are, but it’s great to see you.’ Loved that guy.”
So much is going on here, all subtly serving to lift the tweeter into the circle of Bradlee’s supernal light. First, he gets to drop a personalized Bradlee “f—,” which titillates Bradlee’s admirers more than an ordinary “f—” would. Second, “Last time I saw him . . .” implies that such occasions were not infrequent and always informal. Third, “Loved that guy” is the kind of thing you’d say about a fellow towel-snapper at the country club locker room, establishing intimacy. There’s more, but that’s at least three tweets in one.
With so many words pouring out, there was bound to be some repetition. Bradlee, the New Yorker affectionately recalled, “had the attention span of a gnat.” Also, said the New York Times, “he had the attention span of a gnat.” Many writers noted that Bradlee would express his admiration for colleagues by noting—this is a metaphor, I’m sure—their brass testicles. Bradlee himself, theTimes told us, “clanked when he walked.”
“Men were divided into two camps,” said a Post writer: “those whose private parts ‘clanked when they walked’ and those whose, alas, didn’t.” Bradlee of course was a member of the first camp. You could look it up in the Times. He must have sounded like a trolley car. His fearlessness became the grand theme of the obituaries. “Bradlee,” wrote a blogger on the website Vox.com, “built his legend—and his paper—because he was willing to be hated.” The same Post tribute went on: “Nothing pleased Bradlee more than a piece that nailed the corrupt, pricked a narcissist, uncovered a creep, exposed a phony, felled a climber and really told it like it was.”
But not all such pieces pleased Bradlee, not if they were directed at him or other members of the establishment, among whom were plenty of creeps, narcissists, and climbers, though their creepiness, narcissism, and climbing skills were protected by virtue of being members of Bradlee’s class. I don’t mean the Brahmin class he was born into but the new class of elite journalism, academia, philanthropy, mass entertainment, and finance that remains, in its way, as oblivious and self-satisfied as the old elite it replaced. The obituarists, all members in good standing, filled their tributes with quotes and turns of phrase from Bradlee. No one mentioned my favorite, which came from the mid-1980s.
Bradlee was complaining that a lot of the fun had gone out of journalism during the Reagan years. The reason, he said, was that “there are so many of these asshole watchdog groups now.”
He was referring in particular to Accuracy in Media, or AIM, a conservative practitioner of the kind of ideological press criticism that is now a common feature of the media world, so greatly enlarged by cable TV and the Internet. These parvenus were crowding his territory, barbarians trying to breach the gates. He and his friends were the watchdogs, goddammit, and the watchdog didn’t need any watchdogs watching it. But the new order allowed the watchdogs and other buttinskis an audience as large as his own paper’s. It made Bradlee churlish. AIM was founded by an earnest man named Reed Irvine, a sweet, slightly buffoonish drudge whose suit always seemed a size and a half too large and whose pinched appearance made him easily mocked, especially by men whose own suits were bespoke. Irvine’s great mission in life was to expose the pretenses to fairness and disinterestedness of a monolithic press—to “tell it like it was,” to borrow a phrase from the Post’s piece. He was a genuine subversive, nipping at the heels of an establishment that in its vanity considered itself “antiestablishment.”
Publicly, Bradlee called Irvine a “retromingent.” The word describes a kind of animal, one that urinates backward. The insult was funny and revealing in its casual cruelty.
These days their battle—asymmetric as it was—seems so long ago, a dispute from a vanished era. The tributes to Bradlee from his protégés had the same quality, voices assuming the authority of an order that is passing, that has passed away. Now that both men are dead, I hope it’s some consolation to the shade of Reed Irvine to know that, in the effort to dismantle and discredit a corrupt regime, he won and Bradlee lost.
Andrew Ferguson is a senior editor at The Weekly Standard.
This is what we will be treated to when Dan Rather moves on. His years of fraudulent reporting will be hailed as a career of journalistic achievement.
Yes, Ben had the Big Head. There’s no question he had a highly inflated opinion of himself.
“If you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all” and its modern corollary: “If you say something nice, overdo it.”
The same journalist group that could not find anything nice to say about Margaret Thatcher when she passed.
A lot of celebrities have large heads. But the head explodes and recedes according to their various successes and failures. I saw Liza Minnelli back in 1975 and her head was HUGE. In the 1990s, I saw her in the audience of a play and her head was miniscule. At The Palace in the 21st century, her head was big again. Go figure.
Whatever bats inhabited that belfry had room to spare.
I was just thinking about this phrase the other day but not in connection with Ben Bradlee. It works though.
Sounds like something that needs to be investigated with federal grant money.
How far a gnat can jump was already investigated by Socrates in his Thinkery (see Aristophanes' play The Clouds).
This thread is not about Roethlisberger?
a much more accomplished Ben
While the Post was marginally better than the Slimes, both major lib rags stoutly ignored a lot of relevant news that would embarrass liberal pols, pundits, and general public lowlifes. It’s not the lies they tell, it’s the truth they ignore.
Men who like to talk about genitals are worried that their own aren't good enough.
With a head that large and that many bats, his skull should have gone condo.
If it had, it would have been more productive than at any other time in his life since World War II.
It was a dark and stormy night . . . LMAO
Ben Bradlee & his mentor Katherine Graham deserve to be remembered for their towering arrogance which was imperial, massive, & of “we are not amused” proportions.
When the Washington Times first stood up in 1982 as a counterpoint to WaPo, the two liberal patricians reacted with “off with their heads” toward anyone working for, seen reading, or saying a kind word about, the conservative upstart newspaper.
Bradlee in his well bred style, referred to the W.T. only as “that g**d**nned Moonie rag”.
He is not missed. Only his third squeeze Sally Quinn remains to carry on his tradition of aristocratic disdain. BTW, the former “sexy Sallie” is probably Washington’s best known atheist. She is no fan of Hillary but that is nothing more than the rivalry of two queen bees.
Good recall on history. I had forgotten about the animosity that came from competition. It’s much like the current rants against Fox or Breitbart, isn’t it.
The Washington Post was the morning paper that D.C. power elites took with their breakfast. Their competition for years was The Evening Star, followed by The Washington Star which folded & was immediately followed by The Washington Times still in print after 32 years.
I was stationed in Germany in 1982 when I began subscribing to the W.T. I could see morale & everything else about our military improving greatly with Ronald Reagan as President. The Washington Times supported him, the WaPo just nipped at his heels as usual, showing how Ben Bradlee was nothing but an insufferable jerk
no fair, Snoopy was a much better scribe;>)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.