Childers probably could won except for stuff like this. The fix is in for Cochran.
is this an op ed or a news story cause the headline is really biased.
Childers may win by opposing amnsety. Conservatives called racists by Cochran may just vote for Childers.
“to set legal immigration at the lowest feasible levels consistent with the national security, economic, demographic, environmental and socio-cultural interests of the present and future.”
Sounds great to me. Why does Ronni Mott object to that?
Both FAIR and Numbers USA are striving valiantly to educate Americans on our out-of-control mass immigration disaster. More power to ‘em. I notice one of this writers’ main “sources” is the SPLC, a far-left organization which smears any group which opposes their far-left agenda.
I guess “reform” in the view of the Left can only equal amnesty and open borders - and not reform as FAIR means it - i.e. reforming our laws to reduce third world immigration and to slow the USA’s destruction.
Mississippi ping
Childers had my vote after the runoff shenanigans. Barbour and his knew they could get away with it when they tried it, I mean who won’t to keep Dingy Harry out? Well if my one vote against the establishment tilts the balance of RINO power the wave never happened elsewhere
The Chamber of Crony Capitalism would never let Thad sign anything like this, even if Thad knew what it was
Jackson Free Press is a tiny lefty rag catering to Jacksons miniscule white liberal community centered around Fondren neighborhood and those few literate blacks whose politics run deeper than simple EBT recompense
This article signifies nothing