Replies

There you go again. Now you are telling me that you know better than me whether I am upset or not. Well you don’t.LOL

In fact I have found your responses on this to be hysterically funny, non accurate, full of assumptions and non-scientific.

You used a poor choice of words, and rather than admit it you continually post paragraphs trying to justify it. In one of your posts you even stated that you didn’t mean to make moral judgements on the nurses and pointed out how it wasn’t all their fault.
***********************************************************
Here’s another one of your posts:

It is obvious that they were not adequately trained—someone posted that they “had read the CDC recommendations”, as if that constitutes proper training (it does not). I don’t know about the hospital environment, but I can guarantee that in the lab, no one touches a single piece of equipment until they have trained and demonstrated adequate mastery.
*****************************************************
You state as fact that they were not adequately trained based on “some one posted that they had read the CDC recommendations” - Then you admit that you don’t know about the hospital’s environment-Scientific???? Not even close.LOL

**********************************************************
Then you continued your accusations against the hospital:

I’ll bet just about anything that when those nurses sue that hospital, first and foremost in their claim will be the lack of proper training. It is inexcusable how that hospital messed things up—first, by sending an extremely ill man home, which possibly led to his death—second, by not making sure that proper infection control measures were implemented until after a definitive diagnosis and the CDC showed up, leading to the secondary infections of two nurses. That hospital is going to be hammered in the courts, when the lawsuits come pouring in.

*******************************************************
So you are now stating that there is other contributing factors- not just 2 nurses infecting themselves. And you are stating that the hospital failed to have adequate training, failed to ensure proper infection control measures were implemented, even though you admit you don’t know about the hospital’s environment. Tsk, Tsk, Contradictory statements based upon assumptions and lack of knowledge. LOL

It was a poor choice of words, and it’s very entertaining to see all the additional and contradictory stuff you write to avoid admitting it.LOL

The more you write about this the more your credibility goes down and the less scientific you appear to be. By all means, continue on. It’s better than any comedy on TV.

You are getting very tedious.

You would make a horrible safety officer. Your insistence that there is something wrong with pointing out the victim’s role in an accident makes no sense whatsoever. I guess you’re part of the culture that believes that no matter what happens, the person who caused it is not responsible.

You can’t even explain *why* my word choice is supposedly poor, choosing instead to start quoting from my previous posts over and over. What is the purpose of that? Are you trying to illustrate some contradiction that exists only in your own mind? I’ve explained the exact same thing every time, but explained it in different ways so as to try to break through your wall of incomprehension. It has become clear that your inability to understand is based purely on emotion, not on any logic. You apparently want to believe that the nurses who got sick were doing absolutely everything correctly, but this supernatural entity got them anyway, and you just don’t want to see anything contradict that belief.

If you know that conditions A, B, and C have to be met in order to prevent X, and X happens, it is a logical conclusion that one or more of those conditions were not met. You don’t have to know why or how they were not met in order to make that conclusion. The investigation will determine the why and how.

If you can’t tell me exactly *why* you think I am wrong, then I have to conclude that you do not, in fact, think I’m wrong.

Hint: Quoting me explaining the same thing over and over in different ways does NOT tell me how I am supposedly wrong.