Thank you for the link and I really do mean that. It's possible that you may perceive me wrongly. So, come let us try to reason together. And up front, I'll again admit to having zero tolerance for muzzies. Without exception. That's the one group I single out for that treatment. Heck, I've even posted an article about a good Democrat that drew thanks from Jim Robinson.
I think where we unalterably disagree is that I am 100% convinced that Islam's foundation is satanic. There's no sarc tag nor a smilie emoticon accompanying that bold statement. Likewise, the so-called "Prophet Mohammed" was a disciple of the devil. I write those words in all seriousness. If you think otherwise, then we have a immense gap that can never been joined on the topic.
I think I'd be doing you a disservice if simply dismissed the words of Dhiyaa Al-Musawi as taqueria. So, I'll cover a few points with the recognition that my goal is not to persuade you but to explain my blanket distrust of all Muslims.
The video was edited heavily. That raised my suspicions. I also doubt the veracity of the translated captions. But since I don't speak Arabic, Farsi or Urdu, I'll grant that it's accurate and the edits don't take anything out of context. That said, at the 2:49 mark, he states, "The Koran is balanced". No, it's not. He's trying to depict that manual for murder as something it isn't. This falls into the same category as the "Religion of Peace" falsehood. At 4:57, he essentially dismisses Christ as nothing more than good wordsmith or a fine poet. To him, the Savior of Mankind is just another picture on his wall along with Martin Luther King and Mohandas Ghandi.
I'm sorry for what may be an overly long reply but I have enough respect for FReepers that I do think that something other than a quick one-line retort of the "I'm right, you're wrong, get lost!" kind was merited.