Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/23/2014 10:28:05 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki
This configuration shows the F-5EM armed with Python IV and Derby missiles.
2 posted on 10/23/2014 10:29:11 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I love those planes.


3 posted on 10/23/2014 10:38:59 AM PDT by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The F/A-50 (T-50, TA-50) in Korea is most certainly not a variant of the F-5. It more resembles the Korean variant of the F-16. It is used as a trainer to train Korean pilots for their F-15’s and F-16’s. They even tried or are trying to market it to the US as a trainer.

On the Wiki page I don’t think the words “F-5 Tiger” even appear once.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KAI_T-50_Golden_Eagle


4 posted on 10/23/2014 10:58:09 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Was at an airshow in Lakeland a couple of years ago. A member of the Top Gun Aggressor squadron was there with his F5. Loved the plane. He said it’s one of the few fighters left where the flight controls actually move the control surfaces rather than being inputs to a computer.


7 posted on 10/23/2014 11:08:44 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
You know those J58's have a horrendous TSFC. Their are many Turbofan's with approx the same 4000 lbs of thrust per unit. An upgrade to a modern Biz-Jet Turbofan would do wonders to range. I don't have time to do a rough calc, but maybe some other arm-chair aero-FR-enganear can :-). BTW love these birds...
8 posted on 10/23/2014 11:16:47 AM PDT by taildragger (Not my Circus, Not my Monkey ( Boy does that apply to DC...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

At this point, those birds must have serious G-load limitations.


9 posted on 10/23/2014 11:44:53 AM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They really should reengine the things. Maybe go for a single F404 like on the Hornet and Gripen.

But calling it a Tiger III is just way too boring. Need to come up with something new and snazzy, identifies it as a different breed while still paying homage to it’s F-5 lineage.

Wait! I got it! How about “TIGERSHARK”?


11 posted on 10/23/2014 12:48:08 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson