Unless I missed your </sarc> tag, how could this possibly be anything other than vote fraud?
A now 73 year old, who's registered as 164 years old currently, would -- at best -- have to have claimed to have been 112 at the time of his (or her, or its) first registration. Please do explain to me how a voter mistakes an estimate of his (or her, or its) own age by NINETY ONE YEARS. Any age over 21 makes the estimate even worse. Please.