This article’s information is at odds with the autopsy results. Here it is stated that the stipple is related to close range wounds so seems its absence conflicts with the officers version of events.
However, from the Daily Mail’s quote from the autopsy report, “Evidence presented by the Post-Dispatch from the autopsy report also seems to support a close-range impact. The document told how the entry wound in Brown’s hand had no ‘stippling’ - a feature of mid-range impacts - suggesting a point-blank release. “
Is someone playing games with the facts to promote an agenda?
Which autopsy? There were at least two and maybe three.
The one the family had done was by someone who is not even a qualified patholgist, although they did have Michael Baden there to give it credibility.
I doubt if we had any info released from the original autopsy until now.