Dhs12345 didn't just right. "Good link," as in whow, you got it right dude, have another bong. He wrote: "Interesting. I didn't see anything about their sampling, demographics, family income, etc. I didn't have time to read it. Good link, though. Thanks."
Look, dope for you is like a religion. It's a matter of faith. I cannot help you care about the law. I cannot help you care about the people who will become more active as pot smokers.
You previously posted that you were opposed to abortion, right? Tell me this. Are there more abortions now that abortion is legal than there were when it was not legal? Hmmmm? Didn't the pro-abortion lobby tell us abortion would be safe but rare? Now, you tell us pot won't be a bigger problem. I think you've an agenda to do more harm than good with your pot advocacy.
dhs12345, was your "Good link" sarcastic? (If so, I missed it.)
At any rate, "I didn't have time to read it" negates any possibility of that post having been a "debunking." FYI, dhs12345, demographics are in table A.1 and sampling methodology in Appendix B.
I cannot help you care about the law.
I care enough about the supreme law of the land to want to repeal legislation that violates that supreme law.
I cannot help you care about the people who will become more active as pot smokers.
I should "care about" them by supporting their imprisonment?
You previously posted that you were opposed to abortion, right? Tell me this. Are there more abortions now that abortion is legal than there were when it was not legal? Hmmmm? Didn't the pro-abortion lobby tell us abortion would be safe but rare? Now, you tell us pot won't be a bigger problem.
There's a good chance there will be more post smoking - it's unlikely that there will be a bigger problem e.g. with welfare. Adults exercising their liberties, even in ways I consider unwise, is not in and of itself a problem.
Yes. Abortion is much harder to hide than personal-use amounts of pot.