dhs12345, was your "Good link" sarcastic? (If so, I missed it.)
At any rate, "I didn't have time to read it" negates any possibility of that post having been a "debunking." FYI, dhs12345, demographics are in table A.1 and sampling methodology in Appendix B.
I cannot help you care about the law.
I care enough about the supreme law of the land to want to repeal legislation that violates that supreme law.
I cannot help you care about the people who will become more active as pot smokers.
I should "care about" them by supporting their imprisonment?
You previously posted that you were opposed to abortion, right? Tell me this. Are there more abortions now that abortion is legal than there were when it was not legal? Hmmmm? Didn't the pro-abortion lobby tell us abortion would be safe but rare? Now, you tell us pot won't be a bigger problem.
There's a good chance there will be more post smoking - it's unlikely that there will be a bigger problem e.g. with welfare. Adults exercising their liberties, even in ways I consider unwise, is not in and of itself a problem.
Then you’re a utopian libertarian oblivious to reason, facts, or consequences.
And were there more abortions when people like you insisted that that would be fine to be legal? Can you answer that one?
Actually. I found it interesting and a concern. Why? Because my son and his friends have to live in that environment(where pot is readily available).
And pot will be even more readily available now that possession is legal here in Colorado and especially with stores opening everywhere. Not quite as many as liquor stores yet. As I mentioned, a kid can always find an adult who is willing to buy for them.
Plus it has lost the stigma that it used to have because of the medical pretense and the fact that it is now legal and people like those on FR claiming that it isn’t harmful.
So the study in the link is probably way understating what it will be like in a year or so. I pray for our children.