Fun times when they start eating their own. I saw a blurb this weekend that said a Gallup Poll had Obama's unfavorables at a record 57%.
We have to sweep the rats away in November.
To: TangledUpInBlue
This is our next Affirmative Action President,boys and girls.
2 posted on
10/13/2014 11:02:45 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Islamopobia:The Irrational Fear Of Being Beheaded)
To: TangledUpInBlue
She is picking sides with Shrillery so she gets a plum appt after Shrillery gets elected
3 posted on
10/13/2014 11:03:20 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: TangledUpInBlue
Indian squaw Liz Warren sure is getting out there and in our faces a lot.
Is it possible that the radical liberal side of the Democrat party will push her, and not Hillary, for president?
I’ve heard rumblings that the Clinton’s aren’t liberal enough for lots of Democrats.
And Warren could be the historic first woman president. No need for Hillary if there is a more liberal woman out there.
To: TangledUpInBlue
The Fauxcahontas Lieawatha Crockajawea drinking game!
“rigged” Drink!
“hammered” Drink!
“fairness” Drink!
“little guy” Drink!
“cheekbones” Drink!
Fraudawatha runs away from a reporter...CHUG!
7 posted on
10/13/2014 11:06:56 AM PDT by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: TangledUpInBlue
Obama’s economic team chose Wall Street over ‘families’and the golf course over working.
9 posted on
10/13/2014 11:08:54 AM PDT by
IM2MAD
(IM2MAD=Individual Motivated 2 Make A Difference)
To: TangledUpInBlue
She is right, but as usual for the wrong reasons.
She would have you believe it's Rich Republicans who are taking away from Poor (i.e. Welfare) Families.
Instead it is Rich Dem Cronies who are taking away from Working (i.e. Productive) families.
10 posted on
10/13/2014 11:09:23 AM PDT by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: TangledUpInBlue
She got the dem talking points memo that told zeros sycophants to pretend to oppose him so that hilLIARy can run as zeros opposition and the country’s next savior.
13 posted on
10/13/2014 11:13:14 AM PDT by
Reddy
(B.O. stinks)
To: TangledUpInBlue
Wait..
WHAT????
I guess this means that Elizabeth Warren is a rassiss that just hates the idea of a black president, right?
15 posted on
10/13/2014 11:15:13 AM PDT by
tcrlaf
(Q)
To: TangledUpInBlue
Princess Fauxcahontas speak with forked tongue about "honorary"
Chief Black Eaglet. She should be sent to sleep with the dogs in the wood pile.
16 posted on
10/13/2014 11:15:15 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Ebola and Enterovirus-D68. Proud members of Viruses Without Borders.)
To: TangledUpInBlue
"He picked his economic team and when the going got tough, his economic team picked Wall Street. ...They protected Wall Street. Not families who were losing their homes. Not people who lost their jobs. Not young people who were struggling to get an education. And it happened over and over and over."That's because only the 1%ers can afford the $50,000 fund raiser tickets.
17 posted on
10/13/2014 11:15:48 AM PDT by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
To: TangledUpInBlue
The further left they are the more they are trying to disempower the comon person so thi sis just BS.
19 posted on
10/13/2014 11:23:57 AM PDT by
amnestynone
(A big government conservative is just a corporatist who is not paying enough taxes.)
To: TangledUpInBlue
If you listen very carefully when Fauxahontous speaks you can hear the clicks of Valerie Jarret’s keyboard as she types into Lizzie’s TelePrompTer.
21 posted on
10/13/2014 11:46:12 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
To: TangledUpInBlue
Guess what Lizzie, your team would do the same exact thing.....and you know it.
23 posted on
10/13/2014 11:47:08 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
To: TangledUpInBlue
24 posted on
10/13/2014 11:48:24 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
To: TangledUpInBlue
To: TangledUpInBlue
This 'criticism' of Obama is actually just re-treaded Clintonian Triangulation.
For those not familiar with the stunt, it goes like this:
1. Profess 'concern' with someone's 'point of view'.
2. Pledge that you will not be aligned with that point of view, 'until significant changes are made'.
3. Don't mention it for a while.
4. Give an interview where you've suddenly come around, because the other person's point of view has 'changed'. When in fact, the only thing that changed was the liberal reporter's underwear (maybe)
Win!
30 posted on
10/13/2014 12:04:53 PM PDT by
IncPen
(None of this would be happening if John Boehner were alive...)
To: TangledUpInBlue
this from the woman who made a fortune on foreclosures ....
speaking of families
31 posted on
10/13/2014 12:07:41 PM PDT by
silverleaf
(Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
To: TangledUpInBlue
An additional truth is that Warren, as head of that new consumer protection agency WAS on Obamas economic team. She had a seat at the table, gave it up (sold out) to be a Senator.
As a quitter, she has no cred here.
To: TangledUpInBlue
Nope, not eating their own, it’s a COORDINATED STRATEGY, for sure. They are trying to give Hillary as much distance from Obama as possible, and this is the only way to do it.
When Dems start going after Hillary too, such as regarding the Middle East, then I would agree that they are eating their own. We’ll see if that happens, but I don’t expect it to.
34 posted on
10/13/2014 3:24:13 PM PDT by
BobL
(Don't forget - Today's Russians learn math WITHOUT calculators.)
To: TangledUpInBlue
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson