Posted on 10/12/2014 7:28:32 AM PDT by Kaslin
Even in their darkest hour, Democrats can still count on one group to support them, Hollywood. The land of make believe is filled with hopelessly liberal fools who continue to give major donations to Democrat Party leaders. In recent days, Vice President Joe Biden, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Obama have benefited from lavish Hollywood fundraisers.
Last night, Barack Obama was celebrated at an extravagant fundraiser hosted by actress Gwyneth Paltrow, a far left wing activist. The event featured some of the biggest names in Hollywood, such as actress Julia Roberts. Tickets cost as much as $15,000 each with the funds benefitting the Democratic National Committee.
When introducing Obama, Paltrow gushed, “I am one of your biggest fans, if not the biggest.” After a series of inane comments, the Obama super fan uttered her most idiotic statement, “It would be wonderful if we were able to give this man all of the power he needs to pass the things he needs to pass.”
Obviously, Paltrow does not have any understanding of American history or the basic tenets of our constitutional republic. She must want to eliminate our constitutional checks and balances and institute some sort of Obama dictatorship. It is bad enough that the President has expanded the powers of his office in relation to an “inert” Congress, but he will soon be granting amnesty via executive order to millions of illegal immigrants. This upcoming move will create economic misery and will not only circumvent Congress, but it will also violate the law.
Incredibly, the expanded executive powers of President Obama are not enough for Hollywood liberals. Paltrow seemingly wants to disband Congress, especially since the House is led by Republicans, and let Obama have ultimate power to rule over his loyal subjects, like the big Democrat Party donors in Hollywood.
The problem for Gwyneth’s dreamy scenario is the millions of hard working; patriotic Americans who have different ideas on how this country should be governed. Such freedom loving Americans are not enamored with socialism, open borders, and political correctness. To deal with such troublemakers, Paltrow may soon advocate the elimination of all elections and the placement of these irritating conservatives, who are blocking the President’s enlightened agenda, into political internment camps.
Heaven help America if the wishes of Paltrow and Hollywood are ever achieved. It would mean the end of our country as we know it and the total elimination of our cherished constitutional freedoms that are guaranteed in our Bill of Rights.
Hopefully, Paltrow was just mesmerized by Obama’s star power and not thinking clearly. In fact, she admitted her mental troubles by gushing to President Obama, “You’re so handsome that I can’t speak properly.”
While the President’s good looks may be in the eye of the beholder, there is no disputing that Paltrow can’t speak or think properly. At the event, she called herself a “working mother,” who was pleased that the President pushed for equal pay for woman. Any pampered and over paid Hollywood star who equates her status to working mothers insults the millions of women in this country who are struggling to survive in the Obama economy.
The best way to help working women and all workers in America is not to institute more government rules and regulations, burdening business with equal pay requirements. Our objective needs to switch from growing the welfare state and government bureaucracy to unleashing the free market. If we would reduce needlessly high personal and corporate tax rates, it would give our economy the fuel to grow, thereby creating millions of high paying jobs. Such a plan would help all Americans, even those who can’t speak properly.
Hollywood stars and Obola have a lot in common: they assume other identities when doing their job and they are accustomed to citing the words written by others.
I just want to say something about this mantra liberals are pushing, about equal pay for women.
The Equal Pay Act of 1963 prohibits paying women less than a a man for doing the same job.
The Democrats are not being intellectually honest in discussing this issue. What they are talking about is already against the law.
Which means that Obama and Eric Holder already have all the legal tools to enforce that law, and file lawsuits, etc. as needed.
It’s dishonest for them to campaign and say, vote Democrat, and Democrats will provide equal pay for women. The law is already on the books.
The question should be along the lines of, what has Obama done in almost six years as president, to deal with this alleged problem?
Gwyneth Paltrow is a case study in why the Nineteenth Amendment should be repealed.
America ran aground when women were given the vote.
At least we're TOLD she got it right on the first take.
I love watching those outtakes at the end of DVDs where they show the actors flubbing their lines. Even if it's a one-word like, "Hi".
Gyneth Paltrow is such an airhead to begin with I'm surprised the vapors she contracted upon meeting Obola didn't cause her head to collapse into itself.
A black hole of intelligence if you will.
Clarification for the benefit of the NSA and/or DuFu stoolie monitoring this thread: The black hole I'm referencing here is Gyneth Paltrow, not Baraq Obola.
Obola is only half-black.
We could name it the Enabling Act of 1933.
I am not going go take political advice from someone whose job it is to read words given to them by someone else and play "let's pretend".
exactly
These Hollyweird idiots think they are qualified to talk about anything because they know how to recite a script.
Al those odd diets; gluten-free, vegan, etc ... That has a serious impact on your mental processes
I wouldn’t want to give ANY President that kind of power.
Good intentions are not enough and human nature being what it is absolute power corrupts and corrupts absolutely.
There’s a reason Obama can’t get everything he wants and it has nothing to do with his agenda or with the limits on his authority Paltrow is eager to remove.
I read her neighbors are so PO’d at the inconvenience of the affair that they want her kicked out of their neighborhood. Said she can entertain in H’wood and obie can entertain at the Staples center. Just wonderin’ how many of her neighbors voted for the lyin’ king. My guess, 90%. The old “he’s wonderful as long as it doesn’t inconvenience us” attitude.
‘She must want to eliminate our constitutional checks and balances and institute some sort of Obama dictatorship’
Too late. Obama already did that.
Paltrow’s father, Bruce Paltrow, was a notorious Hollywood leftwinger who ran a blacklist against conservatives when he was a tv producer. Nasty guy.
Like they say: The apple does not fall far from the tree
‘Celebrities.....is there anything they don’t know?-Homer Simpson
lol
You bet!
They still blacklist conservatives
Leftists/liberals of all stripes are always suckers for the Leftist Superman. They don’t believe in God, so some human substitutes for a deity who will cure everything and right all wrongs. Quick, name any conservative pol who average conservatives would afford this type of hero worship. Conservatives know as there are no perfect humans (and never will be), there are no perfect politicians. But libs/leftists just can’t help themselves. All power to the soviets, and all power to the latest, leftist politician/superman.
Yes, that’s true, but that also applies to much of the rest of our population.
However, it should be noted that Paltrow is a really special case of extra super stupid.
And really, People magazine, there is nothing beautiful about this woman at all. She’s a toad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.