Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB; yldstrk

I would suggest the word learn’t is an archaic pronunciation of the word learned.

It is spoken by the old country folk of scottish heritage around here, East Tennessee and especially south west Virginia. It is seldom heard now.

“I learn’t to wash my hands before eating”


27 posted on 10/06/2014 6:44:19 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: bert; MrB; yldstrk
I would suggest the word learn’t is an archaic pronunciation of the word learned.

Archaic, perhaps, in the sense that it's loyal to original Mother Tongue, but not archaic if you mean learnt is no longer an appropriate past tense or past participle of the verb learn.

The Oxford English Dictionary - the OED - doesn't say learnt is archaic, it says it's 'chiefly British.'

Again, that's the OED, the definitive dictionary of the English language, all 20 volumes and and 21,728 pages of it.

28 posted on 10/06/2014 6:59:16 AM PDT by Scoutmaster (Today is National Contrarian Day. Go ahead, tell me it isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: bert
It is spoken by the old country folk of scottish heritage around here, East Tennessee and especially south west Virginia. It is seldom heard now.

It's not uncommon outside of urban and suburban areas in central and western North Carolina. While Scotch-Irish descendants might predominate in the use of it now, the origin is very English.

31 posted on 10/06/2014 7:44:08 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson