Just Google “Newark Ebola” ... There are a couple of dozen articles about the Newark thing NOT being Ebola.
It seems some people on FR are heavily invested in the world dying of Ebola.
No, it is fair to say that a passenger from Liberia has a fair chance of having ebola. It might be small "on average" but any one person could be the next Mr. Duncan with 100% certainty. It is also fair to say that we don't know very much about the puking Newark passenger, but that the rest of the passengers have not been quarantined and it would be reckless to not quarantine if the guy was positive. We could argue the feds don't care and might cover it up, but the local health officials would probably not go along with that.
The bottom line is the Newark passenger is (1) free of Ebola or (2) has been zipped off to a secret FEMA quarantine facility or dumped into a mass grave or released into NYC with subway tokens. I'm going with (1).
Just Google “Newark Ebola” ... There are a couple of dozen articles about the Newark thing NOT being Ebola.
It seems some people on FR are heavily invested in the world dying of Ebola
******************************************************
I have read several articles on the Newark incident. So far none have explained how it could be so quickly determined with 100% certainty that it is not Ebola.
Also, if there is one thing I know about the media, first reports are often later found to be inaccurate.
I certainly hope you are not including me in that last sarcastic remark. I am only interested in taking an ounce of prevention, instead needing a pound of cure. That could prevent further exposures, needless deaths, and certainly less angst.