Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maggief
We can handle a few Ebola cases with isolation in rooms that are designed for this. Think the following:

1. Negative pressure room.
2. Double door portal entrance to the negative pressure room.
3. Absolute sterile technique when carrying for the patient.
4. Anything coming out of that room is to be decontaminated and or burned using proper techniques.

The real problem is we do not have many rooms in our hospitals that can provide this level of care. If we have an epidemic those rooms will be rapidly filled. We can not put Ebola patients on a general hospital ward. To do that would infect everyone on the wards.

If we have a true epidemic you will be cared for by your family or not at all. As a medical professional familiar with sterile technique I could "probably do this" provided I had access to proper gowns, masks, gloves, etc. I would also need access to IV fluids for the patient. The vast majority of people could not do this. They would infect themselves accidently.

13 posted on 10/04/2014 7:32:02 AM PDT by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cpdiii

Nurses as a group vote LIB/DIM. You reap what you sow. Get to work.


16 posted on 10/04/2014 7:36:10 AM PDT by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii; All
Spot on, doc.

For those unfamiliar with infection control, there are varying levels of precautions: Standard, enteric, droplet, and airborne. We choose the PPE based on the precautions. The last word that came down to us was that proper attire was gown, N95 respirator (or PAPR if the N95 does not fit properly), shoe protectors, and double gloves. We could also put an N95 respirator on the patient for extra measure. If they don't (or won't) keep the mask on, we can isolate them. If they threaten to leave, add security. If they persist or try to leave and ebola infection is suspected, strap them down because they are a threat to the safety of the general population.

Lawsuit, schmawsuit. It's a different world now.

Plus, any nurse worth his or her salt will operate on the assumption that a person with flu-like symptoms and/ or a fever is infected and contagious until a negative screen result is in.

We do this already with MRSA and C. difficile as a routine. It's not that much more of a stretch to extend that to isolating ebola patients.

As for this article, my bet is that the nurses who were interviewed were union shills jockeying for advantage in contract negotiations.

27 posted on 10/04/2014 9:10:31 AM PDT by 60Gunner (The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
The real problem is we do not have many rooms in our hospitals that can provide this level of care.

No. The real problem is that America is already broke, thanks to leftist policies by the likes of Barack Obama. We can't afford any epidemic, much less this one. Ergo, why it is being inflicted upon us.

I heard that the hazmat cleanup for Duncan re: the apartment he'd been staying is about $65,000. Multiply that by 100 and your average large city in the US will quickly be unable to pay for or handle this situation. Few doctors, nurses or aids will want to put their lives on the line to treat Ebola patients, which will require higher pay....much higher....for their care.

Coming at a time when many Americans' insurance is in a state of transition or non-existant...and when many Americans have lost their doctors and their health insurance plan, this new crisis looks to be deliberately orchestrated, just like the current and ongoing southern border invasion.

When the hell will people wake up and smell the reality?

37 posted on 10/04/2014 9:56:37 AM PDT by XenaLee (The only good commie is a dead commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
The real problem is we do not have many rooms in our hospitals that can provide this level of care.

Don't forget the morgue and disposal of the body.

42 posted on 10/04/2014 10:46:05 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
As a medical professional familiar with sterile technique I could "probably do this" provided I had access to proper gowns, masks, gloves, etc.

For the average person, such PPE would be as much of a liability as an asset because they might offer a false sense of security. They're good for a "bug-out" procedure, and not much more. Taking it off safely is tricky and requires practice.

54 posted on 10/12/2014 1:23:55 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Democrats: the Party of slavery to the immensely wealthy for over 200 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson