Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1
Here's Presidential spokesman Josh Earnest's explanation:

“Earnest argued that because people carrying Ebola don’t have symptoms when they get on planes, there isn’t a need to limit travel.”

WTF? Is this guy insane? Wouldn’t this fact argue greatly in FAVOR of limiting travel? I mean if you can’t tell the infected by inspection then don’t you put a ban on all such travel as the onlyalternativenitive? How in the world could someone say something this stupid and not get called on it?

24 posted on 10/02/2014 7:26:37 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: circlecity

It wasn’t a “reason”, it was an excuse.

Their “PC morality” is such that they WANT America to be “equalized” with Liberia, out of fairness.

But, the war with common sense is such that they have to try to provide excuses.


28 posted on 10/02/2014 7:31:35 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: circlecity

There is an up to 21-day incubation period. So it is entirely likely for an infected person to show no symptoms and not be caught by airport screening.


40 posted on 10/02/2014 7:42:54 AM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson