[freedumb2003]

>>I see you equate my vote (an action) with doing nothing (that is, inaction); is this because my action wasn’t what you personally think my action should be?
Please explain how my action is equivalent to inaction.<<

Your vote was one of the following:

1) a vote for Romney/McCain
2) a vote for a 3rd party (which is the same as 3)
3) a vote for obozo
4) No vote (which is the same as 3)

If I misunderstood your vote then I stand corrected. If if was 2 or 4 then it was a vote for obozo and the same as doing nothing which supports my quote. I assume 3) is not in our universe of possibilities.

[Norm Lenhart]

“2) a vote for a 3rd party (which is the same as 3)
3) a vote for obozo”

Might wanna take a remedial civics course. Clearly you are unaware of how elections actually work.

[OneWingedShark]

>>I see you equate my vote (an action) with doing nothing (that is, inaction); is this because my action wasn’t what you personally think my action should be? Please explain how my action is equivalent to inaction. >
> Your vote was one of the following:
>
> 1) a vote for Romney/McCain
> 2) a vote for a 3rd party (which is the same as 3)
> 3) a vote for obozo
> 4) No vote (which is the same as 3)
>
> If I misunderstood your vote then I stand corrected. If if was 2 or 4 then it was a vote for obozo and the same as doing nothing which supports my quote. I assume 3) is not in our universe of possibilities.

I've made it plain: how is #2 the same as #3?
How and why does my vote for someone other than Obama translate into a vote for Obama?
In logic we would say: P ^ ~P — I want you to show how you arrive at True for the evaluation of ((NOT Voted-for-Obama) AND Voted-for-Obama).