Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tanknetter

“But there’s a big catch: To win Wolf’s endorsement, Orman must first agree to caucus with the Senate GOP if he were to defeat Roberts in the general election.”

And no....Orman wouldn’t lie now, would he?


36 posted on 09/26/2014 7:54:18 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Manchuria Called. They want their Candidate Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: EQAndyBuzz; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican
>> To win Wolf’s endorsement, Orman must first agree to caucus with the Senate GOP if he were to defeat Roberts in the general election.” And no....Orman wouldn’t lie now, would he? <<

Heh. Wolf saying he will only endorse Orman if Orman "promises" to caucus with the GOP reminds me of when Bart Stupak said he'd only vote for Obamacare if Obama "promised" him it wouldn't fund abortions.

No doubt Orman will agree to this "comprise" so when he meets with Wolf, then "evolve" on the issue and "change his mind" after the election if the Dems win a majority and ask him to join their caucus in exchange for a cushy committee chairmanship.

42 posted on 09/26/2014 8:24:15 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Thanks to RINOs, Illinois has definitely become a "red state" -- we are run by Communists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Yes, I would be completely comfortable with the deal. If Orman were to also agree to wear one of those explosive collars that could be remotely triggered if he were to switch caususes.

;-)


48 posted on 09/26/2014 9:19:43 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson