[Resettozero]

"He [was] one of the few senators fulfilling campaign promises, doing what the American people asked him to do, standing there on the floor with Sen. Ted Cruz to do what they could to get rid of Obamacare," Palin said.

Yes, this is a good justification for what she has done this morning. Still am wondering about this endorsement, the Hatch endorsement, and of course, the Arizona U.S. Senator endorsement(s).

Must be my hearing going bad but I don't understand such (perceived) departures from her regular conservatives-only approach. Still think there's something else in the works.

[C. Edmund Wright]

Must be my hearing going bad but I don't understand such (perceived) departures from her regular conservatives-only approach. Still think there's something else in the works.

Hatch I do not understand either. Must be some part of the story not well known. As for McCain, that was just obligatory. McCain did elevate her by picking her - and there is a kind of politeness among those in this game just like those inside any other industry. That's all the McCain thing was.

As for Roberts? She explained it, and the Cruz filibuster was a huge factor (did not remember Roberts doing that, but good for him since he did). Occams Razr. it is what it appears to be.

[hrh40]

In her endorsement of Hatch, in particular, she made specific reference to his decades-long fight for a balanced budget amendment.

Palin is a very specific endorser. With Roberts, she mentions him standing with Cruz against Obamacare.

There is always a specific reason when Palin endorses.

I would advise always reading her entire endorsement, because she will usually lay the reasons right out with precision.