[hrh40]

In her endorsement of Hatch, in particular, she made specific reference to his decades-long fight for a balanced budget amendment.

Palin is a very specific endorser. With Roberts, she mentions him standing with Cruz against Obamacare.

There is always a specific reason when Palin endorses.

I would advise always reading her entire endorsement, because she will usually lay the reasons right out with precision.

[C. Edmund Wright]

Thanks for the info on the Hatch endorsement. Refresh my memory, who was Hatch running against at the time?

[C. Edmund Wright]

I did a little quick research: according to Hot Air, a decent source, Hatch’s opponent had no chance of winning the primary or general - and Hatch’s over all record is not awful. Not great, especially from a state like Utah, but not awful.

[Resettozero]

In her endorsement of Hatch, in particular, she made specific reference to his decades-long fight for a balanced budget amendment.

Palin is a very specific endorser. With Roberts, she mentions him standing with Cruz against Obamacare.

There is always a specific reason when Palin endorses.

I would advise always reading her entire endorsement, because she will usually lay the reasons right out with precision.

Yes to all that you said in your post. Still, I'm scratching my head over this Roberts endorsement...just a little perplexed. But I'm still with her...until and unless she tells me I ought to vote for LG in SC this November.