Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortionist: Unborn Baby’s Soul Only Appears When His Mother Accepts Him
Life News ^ | 9/23/14 | Sarah Terzo

Posted on 09/23/2014 7:46:38 AM PDT by wagglebee

James McMahon, late term abortionist, now deceased, once said: “I frankly think the soul or personage comes in when the fetus is accepted by the mother.”

LA Times, The Abortions of Last Resort, 1-7-1990

McMahon performed partial-birth abortions when they were legal. It’s interesting what he says here – one wonders what gives a woman so much power that she can create a soul just by her attitude and opinion. If the woman never accepts the baby, if she still continues to reject the baby after he or she is born, does the baby still not have a soul?

Family Planning director’s “greatest fear”

ultrasound4d13

“… one of the greatest fears I have is that we will not have doctors to provide care; will not have places and that this procedure will become more and more isolated from women’s health.”

Peggy Romberg, director of Texas Family Planning Association

From a speech given to Texas Tech Medical Students for Choice, March 31, 2000

Quoted in Mark Crutcher “Access: the Key to Pro-Life Victory” Life Dynamics Incorporated,

Molly Yard on “viable human beings”

Molly Yard, then president of the National Organization for Women, gave an interview with New Dimensions magazine about when a “fetus” becomes human being:

Q: When do you believe the fetus becomes a viable human being?

A: If you read the medical knowledge, 26 weeks is probably the earliest. As a matter of fact, I was just reading figures that indicate that a fetus born before 30 weeks has almost no chance of making it and, if it does, it is going to suffer all its life from all kinds of problems.

Q: Would you recommend 30 weeks is a cutoff point for allowing abortions?

A: I am not recommending anything. I am saying that Roe V Wade was very properly decided. It says that women have a constitutional right to control their reproductive lives, that they have the absolute right to choose it in the 1st and 2nd trimesters, and in the 3rd trimester the state has an interest

“Voices of the Abortion Debate” New Dimensions, 1990First of all, does it really make sense to say that this baby below (28 weeks) is not a person

But this baby (32 weeks) is a person?

What’s the huge difference between the two? There’s not much difference on a developmental level, though one does have stronger lungs than the other. Both are capable of surviving outside a woman’s womb. Of course, Molly Yard’s statistics on when the baby can survive are outdated –In fact, they weren’t even true in 1990. Today, the survival rate of babies at 27 weeks is 90% or higher. babies as young as 21 weeks have survived being born prematurely.

Roe V Wade did allow restrictions on abortion in the third trimester, but these restrictions could only go into effect if they had an exception for the “health” of the mother. Doe v. Bolton, a companion case to Roe V Wade that is lesser-known, defined health in very broad terms, including emotional health, meaning that such a law (banning third trimester abortions) is toothless and cannot truly be enforced– The woman could make the case that the abortion would be detrimental to her emotional well-being.

Note also that Molly Yard is not prepared to ban abortion, even after, in her opinion, the “fetus” becomes a human being.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionists; moralabsolutes; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
The only souls these monsters should worry about are their own.
1 posted on 09/23/2014 7:46:38 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus; narses; Salvation
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 09/23/2014 7:46:57 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

More Humanism on display.

“Man” determines right and wrong, and now, “Man” determines when a soul enters the unborn baby.

“You will be as gods, knowing good and evil”


3 posted on 09/23/2014 7:48:10 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


4 posted on 09/23/2014 7:49:13 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The National Organization against Women has a lot to answer for.


5 posted on 09/23/2014 7:49:25 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

James McMahon is now in eternity and knows that he was wrong.


6 posted on 09/23/2014 7:49:25 AM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Of course they don’t actually say that.
They believe that deciding what or who is human is the job of liberal justices, same ones who show up to celebrate gay marriages. .


7 posted on 09/23/2014 7:50:26 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

No presser from Hell as of late from the good DR.!


8 posted on 09/23/2014 7:50:46 AM PDT by DocJhn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Our callous disregard for the sanctity of life in accepting abortion can only expand to legalizing euthanasia and eventually simply killing the old, the infirm or others the state says are wastes of its resources. The Obamacare death panels are just the start.


9 posted on 09/23/2014 7:51:16 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
*“I frankly think the soul or personage comes in when the fetus is accepted by the mother.”*

Was this from the Quran, Outrageous Acts and
Everyday Rebellions, the Nancy Pelosi Goes to “Church” coloring book, or Dreams from My Father?

10 posted on 09/23/2014 7:52:05 AM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

You got I, MrB. The lies of the serpent.


11 posted on 09/23/2014 7:54:13 AM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Yeh not God or anything. If the guy recognized God as creating souls he would have to admit he’s a killer.


12 posted on 09/23/2014 7:55:45 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Jeremiah had a soul in his mother's womb:

Jeremaih 1:5 “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, And before you were born I consecrated you; I have appointed you a prophet to the nations.”

13 posted on 09/23/2014 7:57:37 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Many years ago when I was in college I worked in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Most of our babies were premature babies, some born as early as 6 months gestation. Literally around the corner in the same hospital there was a unit euphemistically called the “Fertility Control Center” where babies were being killed by abortion. Some of them were older, gestationally, than those we were legally required to save in the NICU. I thought to myself that the only difference between the ones who we were legally required to save, and those who were being killed about 100 paces away, was that the ones in the NICU were wanted by their mothers. And I thought it’s a very bad road to go down to say that we can kill some people because they’re not wanted. That’s rather Hitlerian, I think. Ever since, I’ve been 100% pro-life.


14 posted on 09/23/2014 7:58:09 AM PDT by scouter (As for me and my household... We will serve the LORD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

That has got to be one of the biggest, most treacherous rationalizations ever.

There was a German Major who protested at being called a Monster. “We used gas! We made sure it killed efficiently. We didn’t torture them!”


15 posted on 09/23/2014 7:58:20 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I wonder what theological basis he has for that claim. Aside from wishful thinking, that is.


16 posted on 09/23/2014 8:00:21 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care

The lies of the serpent.


I gave a short talk/message on that exact title a few years ago.


17 posted on 09/23/2014 8:01:06 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Q: When do you believe the fetus becomes a viable human being?

A: If you read the medical knowledge, 26 weeks is probably the earliest. As a matter of fact, I was just reading figures that indicate that a fetus born before 30 weeks has almost no chance of making it and, if it does, it is going to suffer all its life from all kinds of problems.

It is a complete journalistic failure to allow any question to get evaded so blatantly. 'Viability' has nothing to do with being human.
18 posted on 09/23/2014 8:01:50 AM PDT by posterchild (It takes a politician to declare a settled science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

If the mother dies giving birth and can’t accept the baby, then what...is it now a soulless zombie?


19 posted on 09/23/2014 8:06:39 AM PDT by bubbacluck (America 180)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PATRIOT1876

Did he not follow the law as prescribed by nine SC judges?

In the US there is no higher authority.


20 posted on 09/23/2014 8:07:43 AM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson