>>I’ll take out(vote AGAINST) an “ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICAN” every time I get an opportunity to, and that INCLUDES the GENERAL ELECTION.<<
And if there are no Tea Party/Conservatives running in the races you vote in — STAY HOME!!! GIVE THE ELECTION TO THE DEMOCRATS!!
Hey, it worked in 2008, right?
Voting for a Scott Brown would be an awfully high hurdle but I doubt he can win anyway.
I will however vote for one very liberal governor and a pretty OK senate candidate in Michigan because I’ve been paying attention to the democrats. If the democrats win this time, they don’t intend to ever lose again.
If I go and vote for a candidate simply because of his party affiliation. He hasn’t done anything to earn my vote, and won’t tell me what he will do if I vote for him this time, doesn’t that sort of put me on par with certain minority groups that are herded to the polls, and punch the ballot for the guy with a D behind his name every single election? Mindlessly, year after year voting the same way, and never seeing results.
Save your breath, the fanatics will only deride you, call you a coward and other names, and you can't change a mind that refuses to use reason.
That is what gave us Obamacare. Just one more establishment Republican or "RINO" in the Senate and Obamacare never would have become law.
If the "principled" posters here have their way and Democrats end up controlling the Senate because someone like Roberts loses in Kansas, Harry Reid and the Democrats will continue to pack the courts with liberal justices with lifetime appointments using the nuclear option to do it.