Shia Obola does not even have birth certificate
or a resume -— except in arabic.
These anti-science “scientists” who push gloBULL warming should be beaten with their worthless, read-by-noone dissertations until they beg for forgiveness. They are so integrity-impaired and moral-deficient.
Ninety-seven percent. That’s a hell of a lot of “scientists” who rely on government grants for a living.
Hard to imagine a topic less consequential and less interesting than the bumping of CO2 concentrations back closer to what they were (and ought to be) before we entered the current period of CO2 starvation (bad for many plants) and almost continuous ice ages.
Given the stated criteria, I am surprised that they found anyone who disagreed. Carbon dioxide is indisputedly a greenhouse gas. Humans have certainly had some effect on climate, although probably very small. These facts are not in dispute.
This is a good illustration of how science has been completely subverted to support political objectives and political goals. Science as a process and as a profession has been destroyed by this nonsense. Those who profess to be scientists no longer have any credibility.
From the comments....
WChat the heck is the Quigley formula?
I thought I knew all the good conspiracy theories...
Of the 10,250 people asked by a college student in a biased and poorly framed survey, 3,146 responded. Of those, only 157 were real climate scientists and only 77 of them were actually published. Out of the 77 remaining, 75 of them, or 97 percent, answered the questions the way we hoped and they believe that man causes global warming.”
"Shock news from the Heartland Institute’s Ninth International Climate Change Conference: among the 600 delegates, the consensus that Man contributes to global warming was not 97%. It was 100%."
Not one of the "climate change deniers" in the audience answered "no" to any of the questions below:
1. Does climate change?2. Has the atmospheric concentration of CO2 increased since the late 1950s?
3. Is Man likely to have contributed to the measured increase in CO2 concentration since the late 1950s?
4. Other things being equal, is it likely that adding CO2 to the atmosphere will cause some global warming?
5. Is it likely that there has been some global warming since the late 1950s?
6. Is it likely that Man’s emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases have contributed to the measured global warming since 1950?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/11/the-climate-consensus-is-not-97-its-100/