Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Targeting Libertarians with Clever Humor…and Not-So-Clever Humor
Townhall.com ^ | September 15, 2014 | Daniel J. Mitchell

Posted on 09/15/2014 8:33:27 AM PDT by Kaslin

I’m very depressed that my beloved Georgia Bulldogs lost to the South Carolina Gamecocks. So instead of writing about a serious topic, we’re going to enjoy some laughs today by reviewing some new anti-libertarian humor.

I’m a libertarian, of course, as are all decent and humane people.

But I appreciate clever humor, even when I’m the target. This video about Somalia being a libertarian paradise, for instance, is an excellent example of political satire. It takes a stereotype and milks it for some great laughs.

I also have to tip my proverbial hat to the person who put together this image of libertarian utopia.

It’s misleading, of course, since libertarians either have no problem with local paramedic services or they believe in private contracting of such services. But for purposes of humor, this image is great satire since it combines the stereotype of libertarians being all about profit and the stereotype of no basic government services in a libertarian world.

If you liked the above image, here’s some additional anti-libertarian satire that is similarly amusing.

Now let’s look at some anti-libertarian humor that falls flat.

As I suggested above, political humor effective is effective when it seizes on something that is true and then applies that stereotype to an absurd situation.

But this next image makes no sense. It implies that there will be more violent, drug-related crime in the absence of prohibition.

But there’s lot of violence surrounding marijuana and other drugs precisely because they are illegal and that creates lucrative opportunities for sellers in the black market.

Simply stated, if you end drug prohibition, then criminal gangs and cartels will lose their markets.

If you don’t believe me, ask yourself why there was lots of violence during the Al Capone era in the 1920, whereas you don’t see Heineken and Anheuser-Busch engaging in shoot outs today.

Or let’s look at the issue from another perspective. What if the lifestyle fascists banned cigarettes. Right now, with cigarettes being legal, there’s no violence between Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds. But imagine what would happen if cigarettes went underground and their distribution was controlled by thugs? Of course there would be violence.

I’m not trying to turn this post into a lecture on drug prohibition, so I’ll stop here. But I did want to expose the intellectual vapidity of the person who put together the second image.

By the way, some of my libertarian friends complain when I share anti-libertarian humor. I have three responses.

1. I share lots of humor mocking statists and regular readers know that advocates of bigger government are my main targets.

2. Self-confident people should have the ability to laugh at themselves and libertarians (thanks in part to Obama) have ample reason to be confident of their ideas.

3. I’m more than happy to share pro-libertarian humor. The only problem is that I’ve only found a handful of examples.

Libertarian Jesus scolding modern statists.

This poster about confused statists.

The libertarian version of a sex fantasy.

So feel free to send any new material my way. All (good) political humor is appreciated.


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: libertarian; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 last
To: ConservingFreedom

tendentious — great word!

That’s why I like talking to libertarians.


141 posted on 09/15/2014 1:48:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I like talking to nanny-statists because they inevitably expose the weakness of their position by resorting to evasions and/or personal attacks.
142 posted on 09/15/2014 1:54:09 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Look FRiend. Is that some reason you and I can disagree without you getting all riled up about it?

I meant no insult. Tendentious IS a wonderful word. It truly is.

Unfortunately, as people text to each other, words often sound harsher than intended.


143 posted on 09/15/2014 2:00:04 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
you getting all riled up about it?

I'm not riled in the least.

I meant no insult.

None taken - just calling 'em as I sees 'em.

144 posted on 09/15/2014 2:27:23 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Just to be crystal clear, I haven't taken anything you've posted as a personal attack.
145 posted on 09/15/2014 2:28:51 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Shout me down.” Lol.

I guess calling you on lies is now shouting you down.

Add that to another exaggeration.

You’re a piece of work.


146 posted on 09/15/2014 4:36:30 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

You really do take yourself too seriously, FRiend.


147 posted on 09/15/2014 6:52:59 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yes I take lying seriously. I can see you will not respond or admit.

So goodbye. I don’t have people like you as FRiends


148 posted on 09/15/2014 8:01:46 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian
You really do take yourself too seriously, FRiend.
149 posted on 09/15/2014 8:04:15 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; BenLurkin; mountainlion; morphing libertarian
Ronald Reagan and William F. Buckley were close friends.

Surely you're aware of this fact, and that Buckley is probably the most famous libertarian there has ever been. Some of you people on this board could could learn some valuable lessons from this close friendship, and stop being so nasty to your natural allies.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/William_F._Buckley,_Jr._with_President_Reagan_1986.jpg


150 posted on 09/18/2014 3:08:28 AM PDT by FBD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: FBD

Reagan wasn’t a libertarian, even if you post big pictures.


151 posted on 09/18/2014 7:21:03 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: FBD

People who lie and grossly exaggerate and constantly ridicule are not my allies

Why join with dishonorable people.


152 posted on 09/18/2014 8:48:47 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom
They oppose [...] regulation of industry

Sounds like a conservative position to me.

I came across this one the other day:

Ayn Rand, Rand Paul and Paul Ryan walk into the bar. The bartender serves them tainted alcohol because there are no regulations. They die.

153 posted on 09/18/2014 8:59:25 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels"-- Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Every page of the tens (hundreds?) of thousands of pages that comprise the federal regulatory code is a bulwark between evil industry and the lives of Americans - or so they assure me at DU.
154 posted on 09/18/2014 9:14:08 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson