Posted on 09/12/2014 9:12:03 AM PDT by jazusamo
A senior Democratic tax writer said Friday that the Obama administration could take unilateral action targeting offshore tax deals before Congress leaves town for the midterm elections.
Rep. Sandy Levin (D-Mich.) said that Treasury Secretary Jack Lew told a group of House Ways and Means Democrats on Wednesday that the White House would roll out administrative actions against the recent influx of so-called inversions when theyre ready. That could be next week, Levin said at a breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor.
Lew has only said that the administration would decide in the very near future how to respond to the cross-border mergers, and that it would be preferable for Congress to pass legislation on the matter. Republicans and Democrats remain divided even among themselves, in some cases over how to respond to the deals, which allow companies to cut their tax bills by moving their address abroad.
Congress is currently grappling with a bill to fund the government past September and how to deal with President Obamas request to arm and train Syrian rebels. But with voters heading to the polls in less than two months, lawmakers still hope to return to their states and districts as soon as the end of next week.
Experts are divided over how much power the White House has to limit inversions on its own.
But tax analysts generally think that Obama has more power to roll back the economic appeal of an inversion than to stop the moves altogether. In recent inversions, U.S. companies have often merged with smaller foreign competitors, reincorporating abroad in the process.
On Friday, Levin said that Treasurys actions would likely do more than just nibble around the edges and that it was important to put companies thinking about an inversion on notice. But he also made clear that, like Lew, he believes executive action will be no substitute for congressional action.
I think the Treasury secretary has tried to temper expectations. Thats why he said Congress should act, Levin said.
Any White House action, Levin added, wont get, in terms of the content, to the heart of the matter.
Funny how the taxpayer-funded GM bailout was used to bolster overseas operations, and not those in the US.
Exactly...There are more GM stories in the news now about them and Europe, China and India than the U.S.
Since when does the Executive Branch write tax laws?...........................
Well, here's the change but it will not change anything accept the red tape and
the perseverance of finding the new loopholes.
Directive 10-289 (I think?)
Atlas Shrugged turns out not to have been a warning but a how-to manual.
Congress PERMITS dictatorship.
So rather than dealing with the real problem-high corporate taxes, he’d rather try to punish those who would escape tyranny.
Yep, it’s the corporate tax rate that’s the real problem.
Article I, Section 8 of that tattered old document nobody in D.C. reads anymore...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.