Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yahoo describes surveillance fight (PRISM - US Gov threatens $250K/day fine)
Washington Post ^ | Sept 11, 2014 | Associated Press

Posted on 09/11/2014 5:05:25 PM PDT by dayglored

WASHINGTON — Yahoo said Thursday the government threatened to fine the company $250,000 a day if it did not comply with demands to go along with an expansion of U.S. surveillance by surrendering online information, a step the company regarded as unconstitutional.

The outlines of Yahoo’s secret and ultimately unsuccessful court fight against government surveillance emerged when a federal judge ordered the unsealing of some material about Yahoo’s court challenge.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; nsa; prism; yahoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: null and void

but is that enough aluminum???


21 posted on 09/11/2014 8:02:30 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Perhaps.


22 posted on 09/11/2014 8:04:23 PM PDT by null and void (Only God Himself watches you more closely than the US government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Yahoo execs could have stopped this by simply going public. obama could not arrest or fine anyone as he was breaking the law.


23 posted on 09/11/2014 8:43:30 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound
> Yahoo execs could have stopped this by simply going public. obama could not arrest or fine anyone as he was breaking the law.

Problem is, the spooks were not breaking the law -- the government made the laws to allow this. Oh, you think you have to have open public laws? You silly person. These were classified laws. You're not allowed to talk about the fact that you're bound by them, either.

The Yahoo execs would have found themselves in a world of hurt. Why do you think they had to eventually fold and submit to it? Certainly not because they wanted to. It's because their lawyers studied the options and decided that the Feds held all the cards.

24 posted on 09/11/2014 8:58:01 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is...sounding pretty good about now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

4th amendment doesn’t mean much to an Indonesian.


25 posted on 09/11/2014 11:47:38 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall ; / ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Yet, Yahoo made nary a peep at the time.

Had this threat been exposed publicly, my bet is the outrage would have caused the government to back off.


26 posted on 09/12/2014 4:28:38 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Public would have been outraged. The democrats would have had to back off.


27 posted on 09/12/2014 6:27:32 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson