Posted on 09/07/2014 6:50:11 AM PDT by cotton1706
What is up with the ubiquitous Mitt? He’s flitting about—as would any public office aspirant trying to gain voter interest in their candidacy—making the scene on radio and T.V., while enthusiastically endorsing the go-along-to-get-along hack candidates backed by the Progressive RINO Establishment; champions of crony capitalism, electoral criminality (remember Mississippi), and fraternal loyalty to the ruling class: still neglecting to embrace a concise articulation of the Constitutional Conservatism they rightly view as a threat to their established Inside-Beltway political racket pecking order.
The elitist, morally relativistic, self-serving behavior of the establishmentarians illustrates a resistance and incapacity to communicate with their actual, real, statistical base—an American patriotic majority, ever less silent—and proves again why every stilted, disingenuous talking point and faux conservative smoke-and-mirror position is a harbinger of doom for the Republican Party’s already dim future, unless the party of Lincoln, Coolidge, and Reagan is reclaimed by We the People through well-informed hard work before election time and a burning patriotic desire to rebuild it as a principles centered political party; something it hasn’t been since well before the Civil War.
Common-sense conservatives have gained an understanding of the Republican Inside-Beltway political scam; in 2012 conservatives illustrated an unwillingness to accept being pandered to, disrespected, and deceived by the glibly-delivered politically correct Pablum of the Progressive RINO Establishment.
The 2012 Republican presidential campaign proved a setup from the get-go, replete with a multifaceted array of Progressive RINO Establishment primary manipulations, even during the GOP convention in Tampa when a rules change was fraudulently passed by John “Weepy” Boehner during a voice vote.
Mitt’s campaign went over like a proverbial lead balloon with the Republican base, although too many Republican Party loyalists still seem to believe Mitt is the future of the Republican Party
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
The GOPe drives the seat right now for the 2014 election and wants to drive it again in 2016 with Mitt again it appears.
I’m not going along for the ride.
We should think about the success of he UKIP.
Time for the Tea Party to get real.
The GOPc will have input that will impact the Presidential nomination process in 2016
The GOPc will make it difficult for the GOPe
no RINO will get my vote...period.
I don’t intend for vote for RINO’s anymore and will go wherever I see common sense coming from.
If its a Republican I vote Republican but I will write in or vote third party if that is necessary.
The fear and smear campaigns of the GOPe about Democrats winning means little since both parties take us in the same direction with more spending and higher taxes.
One thing you must love about Mitt and Juan: When they oppose liberals, they lose with grace and dignity. Who needs a sore winner anyway, when we can feel so good about losing?
Progressivism is the antithesis of the American republic. It is a socialist state that is communism without telling you the downside of socialism as opposed to individual liberty.
Honestly, I would rather earn the little I do but be able to keep it without compulsory support to the undeserving! Progressives hide their true meanings and beliefs. Beware.
Not to be confused with "Antidisestablishmentarianism".
For a semi truck trailer driver, this article is amazing. I read every word. I hope all Freepers do.
Yes they do. And even further they refrain “Remember Mississippi”. That shows they not only get it, they nail it.
Great read thanks.
Instead of calling them “Progressive RINO Establishment Losers”, why not simplify it and call them “liberal Republicans”?
I think this expression would resonate with a lot of Republicans, both because it says what they are *not*, which is conservatives; but also because it aligns them with Democrat liberals. This clears up a lot of questions.
Then, again, we’ve lost the war on WORDS. Liberal IE: Liberty.
What to use in its place? Hard to know as Socialist/Communist has lost all meaning (just note all those ‘lovely’ Che shirts). Hell, I haven’t heard the phrase Republic from any of those in D.C. in AGES...Americans no longer have any concept of the evil and misery of non-Republic gov’t, outside of the latest war movie/etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.