Voting against Obama, hopefully the same as you.
That would be the extent of my influence. Same as you.
I have no problem with somebody mocking incompetence - if they’ve got something better to offer.
So if I can't swim, I should shut up about it when a non-swimmer jumps into the deep end?
My opinion is invalid because I've never done that job?
Then how can you criticize Obama, since you've never been president?
You’ve got scathing wit; why not direct it at Obama’s law-breaking rather than at Orly?
There are no Obama supporters here. He doesn't post here.
Raging against machines seems kind of pointless.
And what is DESPERATELY needed now - as was needed all along - is people who would force laws and the Constitution to be obeyed.
True enough. Those would be some elected officials.
I'm not one of those. So why hang all this mess on me?
You're the one with the failed product, don't blame me for not buying it.
Our influence extends much farther than just our vote. That’s why the regime hires people to do propaganda all over the web. That’s why they threatened the media. Etc. The propaganda is even MORE important than the vote, because dead people’s votes can cancel out our votes really easily. I voted against Obama in both elections.
But that wasn’t my primary stand against the lawlessness of his regime, and of the entire system. If it was just Obama being a crook he’d be a crook held in check by the system designed to hold crooks in check. It’s not just him. The whole system is broken. Getting rid of Obama isn’t going to change that. Fixing the system is going to take the hard work of identifying where it went wrong, getting rid of the lawless infiltration of the system, and building up the parts that are corrupted or too weak to fulfill their role in the checks and balances. That is what I have been working on.
The lawlessness of Obama’s regime is widely recognized, finally. Nothing is happening with it, because Congress is going to get the same legal slap-down as the lowly “birthers” got - none of your business, no standing, it’s just “politics”, etc ad nauseum.
If Congress wanted to have a chance at stopping Obama’s lawlessness, they needed to assert the rule of law BEFORE the communist-Islamist coup had 5 years to bring the legal system to its knees. It’s bitter irony that the same mockery they made of people like myself is the mockery they’re going to get from the legal system, media, etc. The horse is already out of the barn. They had a chance to close the gate before that happened, but they chose to call the serious issue of lawlessness a “distraction” or an “embarrassment” to them.
And those who laughed along with them in their mockery of the issue made it so very easy for them to sell the country down the river. The checks and balances require our vigilance BETWEEN elections as well as the second Tuesday in November.
If somebody who can’t swim jumps into the deep end, you should jump after them to save them if you are able, or you should call somebody who IS able if you aren’t. You shouldn’t laugh. You shouldn’t shut up.
In Orly’s case, she saw America drowning. She isn’t able to swim very well, but she couldn’t just watch America die. So she jumped in with both feet. She’s been floundering, sputtering, trying to keep America from drowning.
And everybody else stands on the shore and laughs at how she’s doing it all wrong.
And then bemoans when it’s clear that the country is dead. Mocks her failure because the country is dead. Nobody else failed in saving America, because nobody else tried. So it’s clearly her fault that America died...
Right?