I don't know about Esq. Taitz personal hygeine.
I imagine it lapses a bit from time to time.
Her infestation with lice has nothing to do with ISIS.
My personal failure to take her seriously similarly has nothing to do with ISIS.
all you had to do was refuse to mock THE ISSUE of Constitutional eligibility and the rule of law. Just being quiet would have been enough.
Ah. I should just shut my mouth.
Screw my opinion.. just let whatever kookery rolls around to go ahead.
Yawohl.
’ll ask it flat-out: Should documentation of eligibility be required, to earn a wage in this country - including for the position of POTUS?
Never said it shouldn't.
What I doubt is that some drooling wild-eyed Taitz is going to enforce it.
I don’t say this to gloat
Good, because your birther stuff hasn't helped JACK.. and gloating over failure would be pretty ate-up.
Orly Taitz has her problems. At least she was doing what she thought she could, for the rule of law.
What were you doing for the rule of law? How did your actions uphold the need for the rule of law, and enforce the Founders’ vision that lawless men be held in check by the Constitution and a vigilant citizenry and legal infrastructure?
I have no problem with somebody mocking incompetence - if they’ve got something better to offer. You’ve got scathing wit; why not direct it at Obama’s law-breaking rather than at Orly? Or cut down Orly so you can support somebody more capable of doing what was needed?
And what is DESPERATELY needed now - as was needed all along - is people who would force laws and the Constitution to be obeyed.
You didn’t answer the point-blank questions I asked. Where do you stand on those questions?