[SoConPubbie]

The one from Arkansas is close to matching the description in the article, but not the one from NC - SS issue is one of a ...and don’t see how the ads could be described as “almost identical”.

It looks like this article is written about the liberal publications’ commentary on the ads vs. having actually seen the ads themselves...but then the next line says that they should be talking about Obamacare, which not only appears in both ads, but is also mentioned in the articles - one of them calling them the GOP’s “dishonest attacks” on Obamacare. Hey Edmund,

Care to reply to Republican Wildcat?

[C. Edmund Wright]

Wildcat I think your point about the NC ad is irrelevant. The ad does run to the left of the Democrats on Social Security. Yes, it’s a jumbled ad that jumps around, but for purposes here that’s not a criticism I am going to worry about.

As for Obama Care, it is fatuous to say that Crossroads is running an effective campaign against Obama Care. And their attacks on Obama Care are again from the left. I also think you’re expecting a 600 word article to cover every single nuance in detail. With 3000 words, maybe, but not an article of this length. There is nothing misleading about the headline or the main thrust of the article.

Mark Levin, Breitbart, American Thinker - and numerous other outlets have chosen to feature (the two different) articles I’ve written on these ads.