Replies

I don’t think a story like this can be complete without also looking at the Muslim strategy for implementing sharia. A while back the issue was whether largely-Muslim communities could have their own sharia courts, to settle their disputes according to their “customs”. (The same issue has been raised in FL, IIRC). The Anglican bishop (or whatever) was arguing for tolerance of other cultures.

There are neighborhoods that are so dominated by Muslims that it is unsafe for a non-Muslim to go there. Who patrols those places? Police who have been given “culture sensitivity training” - which is basically what CAIR, etc are trying to do in the US: get rid of any training about Muslim terrorism and replace it with “sensitivity training” (which is also what is being pushed in the US as a result of Ferguson).

Police trained like that will hear the story of a woman fleeing for her life from an expected “honor killing” and will return the woman to her family to be killed. Because that is the Muslim culture, and to practice WESTERN justice in that setting would be “insensitive”.

And it could get you attacked also. Basically Islam is at its core a violent cult. The methods they employ are the tactics of a cult taken to the same extremes as the mob (or beyond). The primary place of recruitment (at least in the US) is prisons and they are very effective at getting converts there because the psychopathic psychology that creates hardened criminals is the same psychology of the cult itself. Kill whoever is in my way. My father-in-law was chaplain at a maximum-security prison where convicted men awaited the death penalty; he saw the psychosis up-close and personal.

The progression is dangerous: ever-enlarging “pockets” of “immigrants” who settle in one place and create a subculture there - and then ask for that community to be able to govern themselves, for the sake of “multi-culturalism”. But it sets a precedent which then spreads to the whole country. That’s what Muslims are required to do when they reach 10% of the population of a nation, and typically they begin the “softening” process (the demands for societal and/or legal concessions to their “culture”) when they are about 8% of the population. Islam allows dogs, eating pork, etc when necessary, for instance. It is not allowed, though, if they COULD GET concessions. IOW, they will claim that those things are forbidden WHEN IT IS TIME FOR THEM TO SOFTEN THE CULTURE FOR TAKEOVER BY SHARIA. And we clearly see that happening in the US now, just as it has happened elsewhere.

Places like Dearborn, MI are dangerous to this entire country. To get elected the politicians, judges, etc have to pander to the same people who were dancing in the streets on 9-11-01. What precedents are happening there that will spread all over? And if we get “sensitivity training” and special treatment for Muslims in all our police and military training, that is the same route through which the Muslims have terrorized the UK.

Honor killings are happening here. Beheadings are happening here. Massive numbers of Black men are being converted to Islam in our prisons.

Until the society as a whole begins to recognize the systematic process used to subvert free nations, they will be tricked into accepting the trojan horse.

I believe that Islam should be recognized as a religion ONLY IF THE ILLEGAL AND LEGAL POPULATION TOTAL IS LESS THAN 8% OF THE NATION. After that it should be recognized as an enemy of the US Constitution. Our public policy should be to monitor the immigration, conversion, and birth rates of Muslims so we have a constant knowledge of how many Muslims there are in the country. If the level approaches 8% we have to refuse entrance of any more Muslims. So if they breed to raise the population rate, for instance, we respond by refusing visas to Muslims accordingly. In this way we can (hopefully) keep the levels of Muslims below the level where they are required to be terrorists, and Islam can instead be a religion (as they try to claim that it is).