Posted on 08/29/2014 8:51:46 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Chelsea Hubbell interviews the gecko:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezICrZkK0eA
How could this not justify the $600K she was paid?
Remember the Clinton's were booed by lib media/dem party in '88, called rock stars in '92 & '96, called racists in '08, then rock stars again in '12.
It's all about who's best to push the ideology...hypocrisy, corruption, voter fraud, money laundering, pay-for-play...whatever it takes.
Isn’t she already a ‘paid’ associate of the Clinton Foundation? The foundation that Hillary gave her excess salary to?
==
Chelsea doesn’t seem to hold jobs very long. She has had nearly half-a-dozen since she graduated from college. But, with ‘support’ from the Clinton Foundation, she probably can manage to scrape by.
Chelsa’s NBC job was no different than the CBS publisher’s $8 million “advance” on Hillary’s book.
Exaggerated book advances, exaggerated speaking honorariums, exaggerated salaries for no work or for make work, exaggerated donations to foundations with no discernible purpose, exaggerated stock options to people with no obvious connection to the company...
You see this with a lot of people on the political scene both Repubs and Democrats. Its how money is laundered into daylight while observing the legal niceties.
You see all of the above with the Clintons and their circle.
Chelsea's job is similar to the positions in the charity that Bill and Hillary hold. On the foundation's budget, they fly first class all over the world, eat at the world's greatest restaurants, stay at the finest hotels and resorts and are chauffeured to wonderful and exclusive events wherever they are located.
They are paid modest 6-figure salaries for performing this charity work, but the recipients of the Clinton Foundation Charity work are eternally grateful, or would be if they existed.
I saw a few of her on-air bits. She reminded me of a seventh grader reading a school report.
Naaaa. Now shes unemployed, pregnant and poor like her mother. She can apply for WIC,foodstamps and disability!
She will never even have to do real work or think real ideas. Her only work requirement is to be able to breathe.
No one will ever have to hold a Tag Day for Chelsea.
Leni
That’d be my bet...but probably in 5 years or so, after the next generation of Clinton-Hubbel is able to walk and talk.
Even more outrageous than Michelle’s fake job back in Chicago.
Her fake job there would have been a problem both for Hillary and for the network once she officially got going on her campaign. So this had to be done now.
My goodness!
The resemblance to Web Hubbell is shocking in this photo.
I know Chelz is a Board member of the Clinton Foundation, not just a salaried employee, but despite heavy searching have been unable to find board member salaries, which they are entitled to keep confidential. I seriously doubt that they are in the low six figure range. Did you find the actual $ value?
In addition there are numerous spinoff foundations where Chelz is on the board. Her new $10 mil Co-op apt certainly required proof of income before approving the purchase. And she’s certainly spent or will spend more than a million for interior design, nursey, wet nurse quarters, other staff. Chelz is rolling in the mullah on her own.
I’ve been rereading my copy of “Unlimited Access” regarding the clinton’s time in office and how they disregarded so many of the security procedures - young, entitled people showing such disrepect for the White House and procedures. It is reminding me how much worse off we will be if hillary gets elected
Further speculation on my part - but I suspect Chelz's $10 mill co-op is a Foundation purchase, made available to Chelsea as a courtesy to a board member.
Have any non-family or non-FOB recipients of the Clinton Foundation's largess been identified?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.