Posted on 08/28/2014 9:40:36 AM PDT by Kaslin
San Francisco District Attorney George Gascon charged the aunt of a 2-year-old killed by a hit-and-run driver with felony child endangerment. Loyresha Gage, 25, didn't run over her niece Mi'yana Gregory as the toddler stood alone in a crosswalk after 10:30 p.m. on Aug. 15; an unknown hit-and-run driver hit the child. Yet it is Gage who has been charged with a felony. If convicted, she faces years in prison.
I cannot be alone in my first reaction to this story. What was Gage doing taking a little girl and her twin brother to see "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" on a Friday night? Her attorney, Deputy Public Defender Kevin Mitchell, told me Gage was baby-sitting the twins at the time because that's when her sister (their mother) worked.
Gage has pleaded not guilty. Though the driver may be culpable, Mitchell told me, as far as Gage's role is concerned, it "was an accident, not a crime."
As the three left the theater, police say, Gage was on the phone chatting with a friend about getting together later that night. That would mean that she could not hold both children's hands while navigating bustling Mission Street -- a foolhardy choice. When she decided to cross the street, police say, Gage didn't hit the "walk" button. If true, another foolhardy choice. Gage crossed against the light, talking on the phone, holding the little girl's hand. When she realized her nephew was on the sidewalk, Gage, still talking on the phone, turned around to get him and left the little girl alone in the crosswalk. The oncoming cars had a green light.
That's when a late-model white sedan hit the child and kept on going. To date, authorities have identified neither the car nor the driver.
Part of me wants to rip into Gage's stupid choices; she took toddlers downtown late on a busy Friday night. She apparently didn't think that maybe she shouldn't talk on the phone while overseeing two small children who could sprint into harm's way in a blink. Then she crossed against the light with a little kid. And then there's that awful moment when Gage pivoted to get her nephew on the sidewalk and left her niece in the middle of Mission Street. What was she thinking? She probably wasn't.
Another part of me realizes that I wasn't so smart about all the things that can go wrong when I was 25. And even now, at 59, I can make a stupid move in a split second.
It's heartbreaking that Mi'yana Gregory will never have the chance to do half the stupid things I've done in my day.
Gage has no criminal convictions. She has no known history of child endangerment or neglect. Even helicopter parents sometimes make a mistake.
Would I look at this differently if a two-parent family left a kid in the crosswalk after taking their twins to the "Nutcracker" ballet on a Friday night? I probably would.
I called former San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Brown to get his take on the prosecution. "The point of the law is to put people on notice that they have to be very careful when they're handling small children in a place like San Francisco," Brown, now a doting grandfather, told me. "That doesn't sound like a public defender, does it?"
"Criminal sanctions are ways of creating a deterrent to bad behavior or to negligent behavior," Brown continued. And: "You do conform your conduct when you know the laws will be enforced."
Does Brown think Gage should be charged with a felony? No. "I think she should be charged with a misdemeanor," he said. Does he think she should go to jail? "No. Jail's not a place for her. Jail is a place for dangerous people or people who are recalcitrant in terms of their bad behavior."
That's why I think this prosecution goes too far, I told Gascon's spokesman, Alex Bastian. His reply:
"I don't want you to lose fact that a 2-year-old is dead."
Well said, and I do not. A 2-year-old boy has lost his sister, a mother her child, a father his daughter and an aunt her niece. Gage was thoughtless. And she'll have a lifetime to regret that night. That is her punishment, and it is no bargain.
I don't see the deterrent effect in putting this woman behind bars. Do parents make sure they haven't left the baby in the back seat of their cars to avoid a criminal prosecution? No. They check the back seat because they don't want to be the hapless parents who, after a moment's forgetfulness, discover in horror that they have failed to protect their child.
Right- and I feel sorry for their children.
Some of them will ALWAYS be too young to have children.
Spoiled and immature is not the way to raise children
Opps, my mistake.
Lol. NOBODY EVER gets away with ANYTHING here on FR...NOT the teensiest, weensiest, minute error....NEVER, NOHOW, NO WAY.
We are on the same page again.
I see a terrible accident but I don’t see any intent....I dare say there are few of us who haven’t been involved in some kind of action that we didn’t comment on how stupid we were and what “COULD HAVE” happened.
“Why wasn’t the father watching the kids?”
Obviously, he was working also ...
Definitely negligence is a contributing factor, but the person who killed the child was the one who hit her. Actually I am shocked that this doesn’t happen a hundred times a day. I have NEVER seen black women holding their childrens’ hands. They stroll around with babies barely walking and tiny children trailing yards behind them. One will-sometimes- turn to scream at said child for going to slow, but the minute they can walk they are on their own. Mama/whoever is on the phone or otherwise occupied talking to a companion. It’s common, accepted, childcare to a vast majority of black women, in my observations-and I have black relatives-only one of whom I have ever seen hold her child’s hand when out.
I gotta agree with you, I have noticed this also. I also see a lot of black people dragging kids by the hand, when their feet can barely reach the floor, the kids are sort of tripping along on their tip toes. At that age I was carrying my kid, but I was a big carrier, my beloved mother in law (first generation Scandinavian-American fwiw) used to scold me for it all the time.
Hey, I still watch my 13 year old niece ride her bike and wait with the neighbor’s 7 year old on the school busstop. The rule for little kids in my family was hold hands, or hold clothing, or hold the grocery basket at all times. I can’t fathom letting a 2 year old cross a street without holding your hand. In a case like this the law would be the last of my sister’s problems. If a child of mine died because of her negligence she would be safer in prison.
I hear you. I used to watch little kids, like first or second graders tramping through the snow covered streets of Bayonne at the start of what was a fairly treacherous walk to the local school. It was a very safe neighborhood but not pedestrian friendly. Quite frankly I thought their parents were nuts.
:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.