For a guy demanding facts, morphing libertarian does not seem to have a clue here.
Of course I suspected this about 10 posts back.
Well I don’t want to pass judgment on him. People who weren’t involved in passing Prop 187 don’t have a reason to be as familiar with what went on as those who had a dog in the fight. It was 20 years ago after all and memories get hazy.
But the way that Pfaelzer sat on her decision for three years reeked of collusion with Gray Davis. Those two conspired to insure that no one would get a chance to review her decision which overturned the votes of millions of California voters.
If she was an ethical jurist, and I’m convinced that she is not, then she should have wanted her decision to be approved by the court of appeals. You never heard a peep out of the witch about the way that Davis made sure that that didn’t happen, and I’m sure that she worked with him to make sure that it wouldn’t be appealed. She was about as impartial as Lois Lerner.
This rule by judiciary is one of the worst aspects of current American government. Why vote? It doesn’t matter anyway. If a judge wants to grant foreign nationals, illegal aliens, special rights they will just order it done. If a judge wants to legalize gay marriage they will just order it done. The joke is on anyone who thinks that their vote has anything to do with government. The real rulers don’t run for office, they get appointed to the bench.