First, there is absolutely no way that “re-education against a person’s beliefs” is constitutional.
Second, even if the couple regularly allowed their barn to be used for weddings, that doesn’t mean they didn’t ALWAYS determine who could or could not use it based on other than dollars.
This is their HOME, and what they say about their HOME being a part of their religion is ABSOLUTELY true. It is a basic premise of Christianity.
So, this is different in that respect than a public business like a bakery. (Although, I think independent businesses have the right to offer whatever product they want to offer. If they don’t offer homosexual wedding cakes, then they don’t...same as if they don’t offer bages...they just don’t.
It’s about time some Neo Nazi’s start going to black owned businesses and demand to be served!
Homofascists destroy everything. We will not forget...
The New York State Division of Human Rights is a traitorous organization giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
If forced to have the wedding, there are some pretty nasty smells that can be on a farm. Bring in some pigs.
Submit or pay tribute. Guess threat of death is next ... Reminds me of a particular cult.
Decline to pay the fine as well. Make them work a lien through the system.
Go f*** yourselves, NY state "authorities."
If the farm was not in New York there would be no problem.
The problem is New York
How is that for freedom of religion?
Isaiah 5:20 applies.
Any conservative who still lives in the Soviet State of New York needs their head examined. Moved out in 2000, best move to-date.
We had a wedding at our farm a few weeks ago. The “wedding industry” people that catered it and the pastor all told us we had a wedding and reception gold mine. We’ve been making plans to put a permanent wedding building there. We see this homosexual marriage thing as a possible show stopper.
Too bad you give up your freedom of association when you start a business. This stuff is, obviously, unconstitutional.
It’s funny how the SCOTUS seems to think people give up their constitutional rights once they decide to earn a living and try to feed themselves.
Free country, my a$$. The US has become the description in my grade school years (60’s) of the soviet union.
Extorting Tyrants.. The government not the couple. By this logic then any gay owned business should be required to serve KKK meetings.
It’s difficult to tell from the story. Did the state actually use the term “re-education”? If so, the story can be used as a bat to whack every liberal you know over the head with.
So did the newly weds want the hoedown throwdown or the hoot nancy package?
ping
The rise of Tyranny is manifest. When the people are denied their property Rights by the queer Nation Divorced from God The State has disrespected it’s own foundations. This is the Tyranny one should expect from the Queer nation.It is NOT Just neither is it acceptable.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search