Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mountainbunny

We refused all pre-natal testing for those very reasons.
All our kids are healthy and well loved regardless.


18 posted on 08/21/2014 1:25:06 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

I did extensive testing with my last. I was pregnant at an “advanced age” (anything over 35) and we’d already had a child with a severe heart problem which may or may not have been congenital. The baby wasn’t thriving in the uterus, and we needed to know if there was anything that could be done.

I ended up having an amniocentesis with the knowledge that it was for preparation/discovery only.

Everything was negative, and they never figured out what (if anything) was wrong. Our baby was very small even at full term, and couldn’t regulate her temperature for a long time, but she was otherwise fine.

I was comfortable with the testing, because my doctor is pro-life, and would not have pushed me in any way.

I’d have to think twice about recommending routine testing if the doctor wasn’t pro-life.


26 posted on 08/21/2014 1:42:06 PM PDT by mountainbunny (Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens ~ J.R.R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: MrB

Ditto.


41 posted on 08/22/2014 6:20:44 AM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson