Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jet Jaguar

silence will be held against you?

then just babble about the weather or whatever comes to mind that has no bearing on the case


2 posted on 08/15/2014 3:51:03 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sten

5th Amendment?


3 posted on 08/15/2014 3:51:45 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: sten
Never talk to the police
84 posted on 08/15/2014 6:14:07 PM PDT by antidisestablishment (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: sten

Terrible verdict. What about stunned silence? What about shock?


93 posted on 08/15/2014 6:50:27 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: sten

Shades of Sir Thomas More...

Cromwell: Now, Sir Thomas, you stand on your silence.
Sir Thomas More: I do.
Cromwell: But, gentlemen of the jury, there are many kinds of silence. Consider first the silence of a man who is dead. Let us suppose we go into the room where he is laid out, and we listen: what do we hear? Silence. What does it betoken, this silence? Nothing; this is silence pure and simple. But let us take another case. Suppose I were to take a dagger from my sleeve and make to kill the prisoner with it; and my lordships there, instead of crying out for me to stop, maintained their silence. That would betoken! It would betoken a willingness that I should do it, and under the law, they will be guilty with me. So silence can, according to the circumstances, speak! Let us consider now the circumstances of the prisoner’s silence. The oath was put to loyal subjects up and down the country, and they all declared His Grace’s title to be just and good. But when it came to the prisoner, he refused! He calls this silence. Yet is there a man in this court - is there a man in this country! - who does not know Sir Thomas More’s opinion of this title?
Crowd in court gallery: No!
Cromwell: Yet how can this be? Because this silence betokened, nay, this silence was, not silence at all, but most eloquent denial!
Sir Thomas More: Not so. Not so, Master Secretary. The maxim is “Qui tacet consentire”: the maxim of the law is “Silence gives consent”. If therefore you wish to construe what my silence betokened, you must construe that I consented, not that I denied.
Cromwell: Is that in fact what the world construes from it? Do you pretend that is what you wish the world to construe from it?
Sir Thomas More: The world must construe according to its wits; this court must construe according to the law.


166 posted on 08/16/2014 12:48:53 AM PDT by Kozak ("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: sten

Everybody thinks this is something “new,” but everyone knows that the minute you invoke your right to remain silent...it is an admission of guilt.

As liberals like to say....if you are not guilty of anything you have nothing to fear. Right?


205 posted on 08/16/2014 10:08:27 AM PDT by EBH (And the head wound was healed, and Gog became man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson