Do to statements you have made, I’m not convinced of it.
If there is a clause regarding corrupting the process by allowing information in that cannot be judged, then there might be an argument for it.
You simply cannot come to a reasoned conclusion based on the premise he remained silent. He may have felt very bad about what he had done.
Allowing the information in so the jury could rule that he didn’t care would not be conducive to a fact based determination. It would be pure conjecture.
What is your take on Lois Lerner taking the fifth? Would it be unreasonable to conclude that it is evidence of her callous disregard for the rights of tea party people?
I personally believe it is evidence of her guilt. Her refusal to cooperate in an investigation of IRS abuse should be admissible in both criminal and civil lawsuits against the IRS .
Do you disagree?