Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

Regardless the fifth amendment does not protect a husband from having his wife testify against him, so raising that point is a red herring. The issue here is whether the fifth amendment prohibits the government from referencing the fact that you didn’t say anything when you had just killed an 8 year old when the issue is your state of mind at the time of the accident.

Would you keep that fact from the jury?

Where in the fifth amendment do you have the right to keep that information from the jury?


139 posted on 08/15/2014 9:33:48 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

Didn’t you just state that state laws generally provide for spousal protections? I believe that is reasoned. So my red herring wasn’t so red herring after all was it.

Judges make determinations all the time regarding what juries will or will not hear. Not all of it is expressly written in the U. S. Constitution.

I’m sticking with my decision. You can file an appeal.


140 posted on 08/15/2014 9:38:27 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (We'll know when he's really hit bottom. They'll start referring to him as White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson