[DoughtyOne]

Yikes. LOL

So you believe that someone not making a statement before they are Marandaized should be grounds for conviction? That is the premise of this article.

I don’t agree.

Seems to me I remember Robert’s class act, declaring the Obamacare fees taxes, and thus legitimate, so Obamacare could remain the law of the land.

Folks on the court don’t always get it right.

I would have to agree that Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan agreeing with my take is unsettling.

What would you venture the reason to be?

[P-Marlowe]

I would have to agree that Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan agreeing with my take is unsettling.

Maybe you should re-evaluate your position in light of the actual wording of the fifth amendment and the intent of the framers.

If you are in agreement with those clowns, then you are obviously not thinking correctly.

[OneWingedShark]

So you believe that someone not making a statement before they are Marandaized should be grounds for conviction? That is the premise of this article.

Note that with this sort of idea as precedent — that your rights come into existence when you are told about them by an official — they could beat you until you confess and then Mirandaize you and let you have legal representation [et al].

What do they care? They already have a confession.

[TexasGator]

"So you believe that someone not making a statement before they are Marandaized should be grounds for conviction?"

THAT IS NOT WHAT I SAID!!!