Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy; jocon307; ObamahatesPACoal; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy

Even if the two precincts that haven’t voted favor Shatz, Hanabusa is wise to try to ensure a higher turnout: she’s down by 1,600 votes, and unless she has reason to believe that there was a problem with the count in the rest if the state that, if corrected, will make up the deficit, she somehow needs to net 1,600 votes in those two precincts, which is easier done with a turnout of 20,000 (where she would need 54% of the vote) than with a turnout of 10,000 (where she would need 58%).


46 posted on 08/14/2014 2:58:02 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican; jocon307; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj

Yes, you’re right.

http://www.hawaiireporter.com/hawaiis-remote-puna-area-will-play-big-role-in-picking-next-u-s-senator/123

According to this article there are only 6,800 registered voters in these 2 precincts. If turnout is too light she’d screwed even if it was her territory.


48 posted on 08/14/2014 9:19:37 AM PDT by Impy (Think for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson