To: Carry_Okie
"Child brides" are of prime breeding age for far longer than in the West, where "education" takes so long that women are headed to infertility clinics to have their first baby. Hence, one wonders if this is more a population reduction agenda than it is women's welfare. Yours is the creepiest reply I have ever seen to a post on FR in the 16 years that I have been posting here.
17 posted on
08/08/2014 12:06:37 PM PDT by
Maceman
(The future must not belong to those who glorify the "prophet" Mohammed.)
To: Maceman
Especially since the 20’s is considered the prime breeding age.
19 posted on
08/08/2014 12:08:28 PM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
To: Maceman
Yours is the creepiest reply I have ever seen to a post on FR in the 16 years that I have been posting here. I suspect you are projecting based upon the lack of condemnation for "child brides." It is an absolute fact that drawing out female education is having the demographic consequences I cited. My wife worked in an infertility clinic and saw it first hand. Hence, I educated my girls at home. One was valedictorian of her college at the age of 20. The other is in a PhD program at 21 and could have been there several years sooner. Both girls are virgins and committed Christians. IOW, screw you for "creepy," without requesting clarification. In no way was I advocating child brides, and I do have reason to question the motives of the promoters of this program.
20 posted on
08/08/2014 12:14:09 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(ObamaCare IS Medicaid: They'll pull a sheet over your head and send you the bill.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson